Barankin-Type Bound for Constrained Parameter Estimation
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866929557577138176 |
|---|---|
| author | Nitzan, Eyal Routtenberg, Tirza Tabrikian, Joseph |
| author_facet | Nitzan, Eyal Routtenberg, Tirza Tabrikian, Joseph |
| contents | In constrained parameter estimation, the classical constrained Cramer-Rao bound (CCRB) and the recent Lehmann-unbiased CCRB (LU-CCRB) are lower bounds on the performance of mean-unbiased and Lehmann-unbiased estimators, respectively. Both the CCRB and the LU-CCRB require differentiability of the likelihood function, which can be a restrictive assumption. Additionally, these bounds are local bounds that are inappropriate for predicting the threshold phenomena of the constrained maximum likelihood (CML) estimator. The constrained Barankin-type bound (CBTB) is a nonlocal mean-squared-error (MSE) lower bound for constrained parameter estimation that does not require differentiability of the likelihood function. However, this bound requires a restrictive mean-unbiasedness condition in the constrained set. In this work, we propose the Lehmann-unbiased CBTB (LU-CBTB) on the weighted MSE (WMSE). This bound does not require differentiability of the likelihood function and assumes uniform Lehmann-unbiasedness, which is less restrictive than the CBTB uniform mean-unbiasedness. We show that the LU-CBTB is tighter than or equal to the LU-CCRB and coincides with the CBTB for linear constraints. For nonlinear constraints the LU-CBTB and the CBTB are different and the LU-CBTB can be a lower bound on the WMSE of constrained estimators in cases, where the CBTB is not. In the simulations, we consider direction-of-arrival estimation of an unknown constant modulus discrete signal. In this case, the likelihood function is not differentiable and constrained Cramer-Rao-type bounds do not exist, while CBTBs exist. It is shown that the LU-CBTB better predicts the CML estimator performance than the CBTB, since the CML estimator is Lehmann-unbiased but not mean-unbiased. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2304_07942 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Barankin-Type Bound for Constrained Parameter Estimation Nitzan, Eyal Routtenberg, Tirza Tabrikian, Joseph Signal Processing Information Theory Statistics Theory In constrained parameter estimation, the classical constrained Cramer-Rao bound (CCRB) and the recent Lehmann-unbiased CCRB (LU-CCRB) are lower bounds on the performance of mean-unbiased and Lehmann-unbiased estimators, respectively. Both the CCRB and the LU-CCRB require differentiability of the likelihood function, which can be a restrictive assumption. Additionally, these bounds are local bounds that are inappropriate for predicting the threshold phenomena of the constrained maximum likelihood (CML) estimator. The constrained Barankin-type bound (CBTB) is a nonlocal mean-squared-error (MSE) lower bound for constrained parameter estimation that does not require differentiability of the likelihood function. However, this bound requires a restrictive mean-unbiasedness condition in the constrained set. In this work, we propose the Lehmann-unbiased CBTB (LU-CBTB) on the weighted MSE (WMSE). This bound does not require differentiability of the likelihood function and assumes uniform Lehmann-unbiasedness, which is less restrictive than the CBTB uniform mean-unbiasedness. We show that the LU-CBTB is tighter than or equal to the LU-CCRB and coincides with the CBTB for linear constraints. For nonlinear constraints the LU-CBTB and the CBTB are different and the LU-CBTB can be a lower bound on the WMSE of constrained estimators in cases, where the CBTB is not. In the simulations, we consider direction-of-arrival estimation of an unknown constant modulus discrete signal. In this case, the likelihood function is not differentiable and constrained Cramer-Rao-type bounds do not exist, while CBTBs exist. It is shown that the LU-CBTB better predicts the CML estimator performance than the CBTB, since the CML estimator is Lehmann-unbiased but not mean-unbiased. |
| title | Barankin-Type Bound for Constrained Parameter Estimation |
| topic | Signal Processing Information Theory Statistics Theory |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07942 |