Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10819 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914830210826240 |
|---|---|
| author | Belgodere, Brian Dognin, Pierre Ivankay, Adam Melnyk, Igor Mroueh, Youssef Mojsilovic, Aleksandra Navratil, Jiri Nitsure, Apoorva Padhi, Inkit Rigotti, Mattia Ross, Jerret Schiff, Yair Vedpathak, Radhika Young, Richard A. |
| author_facet | Belgodere, Brian Dognin, Pierre Ivankay, Adam Melnyk, Igor Mroueh, Youssef Mojsilovic, Aleksandra Navratil, Jiri Nitsure, Apoorva Padhi, Inkit Rigotti, Mattia Ross, Jerret Schiff, Yair Vedpathak, Radhika Young, Richard A. |
| contents | Real-world data often exhibits bias, imbalance, and privacy risks. Synthetic datasets have emerged to address these issues. This paradigm relies on generative AI models to generate unbiased, privacy-preserving data while maintaining fidelity to the original data. However, assessing the trustworthiness of synthetic datasets and models is a critical challenge. We introduce a holistic auditing framework that comprehensively evaluates synthetic datasets and AI models. It focuses on preventing bias and discrimination, ensures fidelity to the source data, assesses utility, robustness, and privacy preservation. We demonstrate the framework's effectiveness by auditing various generative models across diverse use cases like education, healthcare, banking, and human resources, spanning different data modalities such as tabular, time-series, vision, and natural language. This holistic assessment is essential for compliance with regulatory safeguards. We introduce a trustworthiness index to rank synthetic datasets based on their safeguards trade-offs. Furthermore, we present a trustworthiness-driven model selection and cross-validation process during training, exemplified with "TrustFormers" across various data types. This approach allows for controllable trustworthiness trade-offs in synthetic data creation. Our auditing framework fosters collaboration among stakeholders, including data scientists, governance experts, internal reviewers, external certifiers, and regulators. This transparent reporting should become a standard practice to prevent bias, discrimination, and privacy violations, ensuring compliance with policies and providing accountability, safety, and performance guarantees. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2304_10819 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Auditing and Generating Synthetic Data with Controllable Trust Trade-offs Belgodere, Brian Dognin, Pierre Ivankay, Adam Melnyk, Igor Mroueh, Youssef Mojsilovic, Aleksandra Navratil, Jiri Nitsure, Apoorva Padhi, Inkit Rigotti, Mattia Ross, Jerret Schiff, Yair Vedpathak, Radhika Young, Richard A. Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence Real-world data often exhibits bias, imbalance, and privacy risks. Synthetic datasets have emerged to address these issues. This paradigm relies on generative AI models to generate unbiased, privacy-preserving data while maintaining fidelity to the original data. However, assessing the trustworthiness of synthetic datasets and models is a critical challenge. We introduce a holistic auditing framework that comprehensively evaluates synthetic datasets and AI models. It focuses on preventing bias and discrimination, ensures fidelity to the source data, assesses utility, robustness, and privacy preservation. We demonstrate the framework's effectiveness by auditing various generative models across diverse use cases like education, healthcare, banking, and human resources, spanning different data modalities such as tabular, time-series, vision, and natural language. This holistic assessment is essential for compliance with regulatory safeguards. We introduce a trustworthiness index to rank synthetic datasets based on their safeguards trade-offs. Furthermore, we present a trustworthiness-driven model selection and cross-validation process during training, exemplified with "TrustFormers" across various data types. This approach allows for controllable trustworthiness trade-offs in synthetic data creation. Our auditing framework fosters collaboration among stakeholders, including data scientists, governance experts, internal reviewers, external certifiers, and regulators. This transparent reporting should become a standard practice to prevent bias, discrimination, and privacy violations, ensuring compliance with policies and providing accountability, safety, and performance guarantees. |
| title | Auditing and Generating Synthetic Data with Controllable Trust Trade-offs |
| topic | Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10819 |