Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bergstra, Jan A., Ponse, Alban
Format: Preprint
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14821
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912627328811008
author Bergstra, Jan A.
Ponse, Alban
author_facet Bergstra, Jan A.
Ponse, Alban
contents Three-valued conditional logic (CL) is defined by Guzmán and Squier (1990), and based on McCarthy's noncommutative connectives, axiomatises a short-circuit logic (SCL) that defines more identities than three-valued MSCL (Memorising SCL, which also has a two-valued variant). This follows from the fact that the definable connective that prescribes full left-sequential conjunction is commutative in CL. We show that in CL, the full left-sequential connectives and negation define Bochvar's three-valued strict logic. We observe that CL also has a two-valued variant of which the full left-sequential connectives and negation define a commutative logic that is weaker than propositional logic because the absorption laws do not hold. Next, we show that the original, equational axiomatisation of CL is not independent and give several alternative, independent axiomatisations.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2304_14821
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Conditional logic as a short-circuit logic
Bergstra, Jan A.
Ponse, Alban
Logic in Computer Science
03C90
F.3.1; F.3.2
Three-valued conditional logic (CL) is defined by Guzmán and Squier (1990), and based on McCarthy's noncommutative connectives, axiomatises a short-circuit logic (SCL) that defines more identities than three-valued MSCL (Memorising SCL, which also has a two-valued variant). This follows from the fact that the definable connective that prescribes full left-sequential conjunction is commutative in CL. We show that in CL, the full left-sequential connectives and negation define Bochvar's three-valued strict logic. We observe that CL also has a two-valued variant of which the full left-sequential connectives and negation define a commutative logic that is weaker than propositional logic because the absorption laws do not hold. Next, we show that the original, equational axiomatisation of CL is not independent and give several alternative, independent axiomatisations.
title Conditional logic as a short-circuit logic
topic Logic in Computer Science
03C90
F.3.1; F.3.2
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14821