Fast and Efficient Matching Algorithm with Deadline Instances
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2023
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866916618453385216 |
|---|---|
| author | Song, Zhao Wang, Weixin Yin, Chenbo Yin, Junze |
| author_facet | Song, Zhao Wang, Weixin Yin, Chenbo Yin, Junze |
| contents | The online weighted matching problem is a fundamental problem in machine learning due to its numerous applications. Despite many efforts in this area, existing algorithms are either too slow or don't take $\mathrm{deadline}$ (the longest time a node can be matched) into account. In this paper, we introduce a market model with $\mathrm{deadline}$ first. Next, we present our two optimized algorithms (\textsc{FastGreedy} and \textsc{FastPostponedGreedy}) and offer theoretical proof of the time complexity and correctness of our algorithms. In \textsc{FastGreedy} algorithm, we have already known if a node is a buyer or a seller. But in \textsc{FastPostponedGreedy} algorithm, the status of each node is unknown at first. Then, we generalize a sketching matrix to run the original and our algorithms on both real data sets and synthetic data sets. Let $ε\in (0,0.1)$ denote the relative error of the real weight of each edge. The competitive ratio of original \textsc{Greedy} and \textsc{PostponedGreedy} is $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{4}$ respectively. Based on these two original algorithms, we proposed \textsc{FastGreedy} and \textsc{FastPostponedGreedy} algorithms and the competitive ratio of them is $\frac{1 - ε}{2}$ and $\frac{1 - ε}{4}$ respectively. At the same time, our algorithms run faster than the original two algorithms. Given $n$ nodes in $\mathbb{R} ^ d$, we decrease the time complexity from $O(nd)$ to $\widetilde{O}(ε^{-2} \cdot (n + d))$, where for any function $f$, we use $\widetilde{O}(f)$ to denote $f \cdot \mathrm{poly}(\log f)$. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2305_08353 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Fast and Efficient Matching Algorithm with Deadline Instances Song, Zhao Wang, Weixin Yin, Chenbo Yin, Junze Data Structures and Algorithms Machine Learning The online weighted matching problem is a fundamental problem in machine learning due to its numerous applications. Despite many efforts in this area, existing algorithms are either too slow or don't take $\mathrm{deadline}$ (the longest time a node can be matched) into account. In this paper, we introduce a market model with $\mathrm{deadline}$ first. Next, we present our two optimized algorithms (\textsc{FastGreedy} and \textsc{FastPostponedGreedy}) and offer theoretical proof of the time complexity and correctness of our algorithms. In \textsc{FastGreedy} algorithm, we have already known if a node is a buyer or a seller. But in \textsc{FastPostponedGreedy} algorithm, the status of each node is unknown at first. Then, we generalize a sketching matrix to run the original and our algorithms on both real data sets and synthetic data sets. Let $ε\in (0,0.1)$ denote the relative error of the real weight of each edge. The competitive ratio of original \textsc{Greedy} and \textsc{PostponedGreedy} is $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{4}$ respectively. Based on these two original algorithms, we proposed \textsc{FastGreedy} and \textsc{FastPostponedGreedy} algorithms and the competitive ratio of them is $\frac{1 - ε}{2}$ and $\frac{1 - ε}{4}$ respectively. At the same time, our algorithms run faster than the original two algorithms. Given $n$ nodes in $\mathbb{R} ^ d$, we decrease the time complexity from $O(nd)$ to $\widetilde{O}(ε^{-2} \cdot (n + d))$, where for any function $f$, we use $\widetilde{O}(f)$ to denote $f \cdot \mathrm{poly}(\log f)$. |
| title | Fast and Efficient Matching Algorithm with Deadline Instances |
| topic | Data Structures and Algorithms Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08353 |