Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.09859 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911783291191296 |
|---|---|
| author | Mireshghallah, Niloofar Mattern, Justus Gao, Sicun Shokri, Reza Berg-Kirkpatrick, Taylor |
| author_facet | Mireshghallah, Niloofar Mattern, Justus Gao, Sicun Shokri, Reza Berg-Kirkpatrick, Taylor |
| contents | With the advent of fluent generative language models that can produce convincing utterances very similar to those written by humans, distinguishing whether a piece of text is machine-generated or human-written becomes more challenging and more important, as such models could be used to spread misinformation, fake news, fake reviews and to mimic certain authors and figures. To this end, there have been a slew of methods proposed to detect machine-generated text. Most of these methods need access to the logits of the target model or need the ability to sample from the target. One such black-box detection method relies on the observation that generated text is locally optimal under the likelihood function of the generator, while human-written text is not. We find that overall, smaller and partially-trained models are better universal text detectors: they can more precisely detect text generated from both small and larger models. Interestingly, we find that whether the detector and generator were trained on the same data is not critically important to the detection success. For instance the OPT-125M model has an AUC of 0.81 in detecting ChatGPT generations, whereas a larger model from the GPT family, GPTJ-6B, has AUC of 0.45. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2305_09859 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Smaller Language Models are Better Black-box Machine-Generated Text Detectors Mireshghallah, Niloofar Mattern, Justus Gao, Sicun Shokri, Reza Berg-Kirkpatrick, Taylor Computation and Language Machine Learning With the advent of fluent generative language models that can produce convincing utterances very similar to those written by humans, distinguishing whether a piece of text is machine-generated or human-written becomes more challenging and more important, as such models could be used to spread misinformation, fake news, fake reviews and to mimic certain authors and figures. To this end, there have been a slew of methods proposed to detect machine-generated text. Most of these methods need access to the logits of the target model or need the ability to sample from the target. One such black-box detection method relies on the observation that generated text is locally optimal under the likelihood function of the generator, while human-written text is not. We find that overall, smaller and partially-trained models are better universal text detectors: they can more precisely detect text generated from both small and larger models. Interestingly, we find that whether the detector and generator were trained on the same data is not critically important to the detection success. For instance the OPT-125M model has an AUC of 0.81 in detecting ChatGPT generations, whereas a larger model from the GPT family, GPTJ-6B, has AUC of 0.45. |
| title | Smaller Language Models are Better Black-box Machine-Generated Text Detectors |
| topic | Computation and Language Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.09859 |