Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kline, Adam G., Palmer, Stephanie E.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11009
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916117987983360
author Kline, Adam G.
Palmer, Stephanie E.
author_facet Kline, Adam G.
Palmer, Stephanie E.
contents Renormalization group (RG) methods are emerging as tools in biology and computer science to support the search for simplifying structure in distributions over high-dimensional spaces. We show that mixture models can be thought of as having multiple coexisting, exactly independent RG flows, each with its own notion of scale. We define this property as ``multi-relevance''. As an example, we construct a model that has two distinct notions of scale, each corresponding to the state of an unobserved categorical variable. In the regime where this latent variable can be inferred using a linear classifier, the vertex expansion approach in non-perturbative RG can be applied successfully but will give different answers depending the choice of expansion point in state space. In the regime where linear estimation of the latent state fails, we show that the vertex expansion predicts a decrease in the total number of relevant couplings from four to three and does not admit a good polynomial truncation scheme. This indicates oversimplification. One consequence of this is that principal component analysis (PCA) may be a poor choice of coarse-graining scheme in multi-relevant systems, since it imposes a notion of scale which is incorrect from the RG perspective. Taken together, our results indicate that RG and PCA can lead to oversimplification when multi-relevance is present and not accounted for.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2305_11009
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Multi-Relevance: Coexisting but Distinct Notions of Scale in Large Systems
Kline, Adam G.
Palmer, Stephanie E.
Statistical Mechanics
Quantitative Methods
Renormalization group (RG) methods are emerging as tools in biology and computer science to support the search for simplifying structure in distributions over high-dimensional spaces. We show that mixture models can be thought of as having multiple coexisting, exactly independent RG flows, each with its own notion of scale. We define this property as ``multi-relevance''. As an example, we construct a model that has two distinct notions of scale, each corresponding to the state of an unobserved categorical variable. In the regime where this latent variable can be inferred using a linear classifier, the vertex expansion approach in non-perturbative RG can be applied successfully but will give different answers depending the choice of expansion point in state space. In the regime where linear estimation of the latent state fails, we show that the vertex expansion predicts a decrease in the total number of relevant couplings from four to three and does not admit a good polynomial truncation scheme. This indicates oversimplification. One consequence of this is that principal component analysis (PCA) may be a poor choice of coarse-graining scheme in multi-relevant systems, since it imposes a notion of scale which is incorrect from the RG perspective. Taken together, our results indicate that RG and PCA can lead to oversimplification when multi-relevance is present and not accounted for.
title Multi-Relevance: Coexisting but Distinct Notions of Scale in Large Systems
topic Statistical Mechanics
Quantitative Methods
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11009