'Ergodicity Economics' is Pseudoscience
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911863797710848 |
|---|---|
| author | Toda, Alexis Akira |
| author_facet | Toda, Alexis Akira |
| contents | In a series of papers, Ole Peters and his collaborators claim that the 'conceptual basis of mainstream economic theory' is 'flawed' and that the approach they call 'ergodicity economics' gives 'reason to hope for a future economic science that is more parsimonious, conceptually clearer and less subjective' (Peters, 2019). This paper argues that 'ergodicity economics' is pseudoscience because it has not produced falsifiable implications and should be taken with skepticism. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2306_03275 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | 'Ergodicity Economics' is Pseudoscience Toda, Alexis Akira General Finance In a series of papers, Ole Peters and his collaborators claim that the 'conceptual basis of mainstream economic theory' is 'flawed' and that the approach they call 'ergodicity economics' gives 'reason to hope for a future economic science that is more parsimonious, conceptually clearer and less subjective' (Peters, 2019). This paper argues that 'ergodicity economics' is pseudoscience because it has not produced falsifiable implications and should be taken with skepticism. |
| title | 'Ergodicity Economics' is Pseudoscience |
| topic | General Finance |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03275 |