Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gaiser, Collier
Format: Preprint
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04029
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916299461885952
author Gaiser, Collier
author_facet Gaiser, Collier
contents Let $f_r(k)$ be the smallest positive integer $n$ such that every $r$-coloring of $\{1,2,...,n\}$ has a monochromatic solution to the nonlinear equation \[1/x_1+\cdots+1/x_k=1/y,\] where $x_1,...,x_k$ are not necessarily distinct. Brown and Rödl [Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 43(1991): 387-392] proved that $f_2(k)=O(k^6)$. In this paper, we prove that $f_2(k)=O(k^3)$. The main ingredient in our proof is a finite set $A\subseteq\mathbb{N}$ such that every $2$-coloring of $A$ has a monochromatic solution to the linear equation $x_1+\cdots+x_k=y$ and the least common multiple of $A$ is sufficiently small. This approach can also be used to study $f_r(k)$ with $r>2$. For example, a recent result of Boza, Marín, Revuelta, and Sanz [Discrete Appl. Math. 263(2019): 59-68] implies that $f_3(k)=O(k^{43})$.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2306_04029
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle On Rado numbers for equations with unit fractions
Gaiser, Collier
Combinatorics
Let $f_r(k)$ be the smallest positive integer $n$ such that every $r$-coloring of $\{1,2,...,n\}$ has a monochromatic solution to the nonlinear equation \[1/x_1+\cdots+1/x_k=1/y,\] where $x_1,...,x_k$ are not necessarily distinct. Brown and Rödl [Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 43(1991): 387-392] proved that $f_2(k)=O(k^6)$. In this paper, we prove that $f_2(k)=O(k^3)$. The main ingredient in our proof is a finite set $A\subseteq\mathbb{N}$ such that every $2$-coloring of $A$ has a monochromatic solution to the linear equation $x_1+\cdots+x_k=y$ and the least common multiple of $A$ is sufficiently small. This approach can also be used to study $f_r(k)$ with $r>2$. For example, a recent result of Boza, Marín, Revuelta, and Sanz [Discrete Appl. Math. 263(2019): 59-68] implies that $f_3(k)=O(k^{43})$.
title On Rado numbers for equations with unit fractions
topic Combinatorics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04029