Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sun, Kai, Xu, Yifan Ethan, Zha, Hanwen, Liu, Yue, Dong, Xin Luna
Format: Preprint
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.10168
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911824955310080
author Sun, Kai
Xu, Yifan Ethan
Zha, Hanwen
Liu, Yue
Dong, Xin Luna
author_facet Sun, Kai
Xu, Yifan Ethan
Zha, Hanwen
Liu, Yue
Dong, Xin Luna
contents Since the recent prosperity of Large Language Models (LLMs), there have been interleaved discussions regarding how to reduce hallucinations from LLM responses, how to increase the factuality of LLMs, and whether Knowledge Graphs (KGs), which store the world knowledge in a symbolic form, will be replaced with LLMs. In this paper, we try to answer these questions from a new angle: How knowledgeable are LLMs? To answer this question, we constructed Head-to-Tail, a benchmark that consists of 18K question-answer (QA) pairs regarding head, torso, and tail facts in terms of popularity. We designed an automated evaluation method and a set of metrics that closely approximate the knowledge an LLM confidently internalizes. Through a comprehensive evaluation of 16 publicly available LLMs, we show that existing LLMs are still far from being perfect in terms of their grasp of factual knowledge, especially for facts of torso-to-tail entities.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2308_10168
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Head-to-Tail: How Knowledgeable are Large Language Models (LLMs)? A.K.A. Will LLMs Replace Knowledge Graphs?
Sun, Kai
Xu, Yifan Ethan
Zha, Hanwen
Liu, Yue
Dong, Xin Luna
Computation and Language
Since the recent prosperity of Large Language Models (LLMs), there have been interleaved discussions regarding how to reduce hallucinations from LLM responses, how to increase the factuality of LLMs, and whether Knowledge Graphs (KGs), which store the world knowledge in a symbolic form, will be replaced with LLMs. In this paper, we try to answer these questions from a new angle: How knowledgeable are LLMs? To answer this question, we constructed Head-to-Tail, a benchmark that consists of 18K question-answer (QA) pairs regarding head, torso, and tail facts in terms of popularity. We designed an automated evaluation method and a set of metrics that closely approximate the knowledge an LLM confidently internalizes. Through a comprehensive evaluation of 16 publicly available LLMs, we show that existing LLMs are still far from being perfect in terms of their grasp of factual knowledge, especially for facts of torso-to-tail entities.
title Head-to-Tail: How Knowledgeable are Large Language Models (LLMs)? A.K.A. Will LLMs Replace Knowledge Graphs?
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.10168