Addressing Selection Bias in Computerized Adaptive Testing: A User-Wise Aggregate Influence Function Approach

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwon, Soonwoo, Kim, Sojung, Lee, Seunghyun, Kim, Jin-Young, An, Suyeong, Kim, Kyuseok
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866929751899242496
author Kwon, Soonwoo
Kim, Sojung
Lee, Seunghyun
Kim, Jin-Young
An, Suyeong
Kim, Kyuseok
author_facet Kwon, Soonwoo
Kim, Sojung
Lee, Seunghyun
Kim, Jin-Young
An, Suyeong
Kim, Kyuseok
contents Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) is a widely used, efficient test mode that adapts to the examinee's proficiency level in the test domain. CAT requires pre-trained item profiles, for CAT iteratively assesses the student real-time based on the registered items' profiles, and selects the next item to administer using candidate items' profiles. However, obtaining such item profiles is a costly process that involves gathering a large, dense item-response data, then training a diagnostic model on the collected data. In this paper, we explore the possibility of leveraging response data collected in the CAT service. We first show that this poses a unique challenge due to the inherent selection bias introduced by CAT, i.e., more proficient students will receive harder questions. Indeed, when naively training the diagnostic model using CAT response data, we observe that item profiles deviate significantly from the ground-truth. To tackle the selection bias issue, we propose the user-wise aggregate influence function method. Our intuition is to filter out users whose response data is heavily biased in an aggregate manner, as judged by how much perturbation the added data will introduce during parameter estimation. This way, we may enhance the performance of CAT while introducing minimal bias to the item profiles. We provide extensive experiments to demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method based on the three public datasets and one dataset that contains real-world CAT response data.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2308_11912
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Addressing Selection Bias in Computerized Adaptive Testing: A User-Wise Aggregate Influence Function Approach
Kwon, Soonwoo
Kim, Sojung
Lee, Seunghyun
Kim, Jin-Young
An, Suyeong
Kim, Kyuseok
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Computers and Society
Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) is a widely used, efficient test mode that adapts to the examinee's proficiency level in the test domain. CAT requires pre-trained item profiles, for CAT iteratively assesses the student real-time based on the registered items' profiles, and selects the next item to administer using candidate items' profiles. However, obtaining such item profiles is a costly process that involves gathering a large, dense item-response data, then training a diagnostic model on the collected data. In this paper, we explore the possibility of leveraging response data collected in the CAT service. We first show that this poses a unique challenge due to the inherent selection bias introduced by CAT, i.e., more proficient students will receive harder questions. Indeed, when naively training the diagnostic model using CAT response data, we observe that item profiles deviate significantly from the ground-truth. To tackle the selection bias issue, we propose the user-wise aggregate influence function method. Our intuition is to filter out users whose response data is heavily biased in an aggregate manner, as judged by how much perturbation the added data will introduce during parameter estimation. This way, we may enhance the performance of CAT while introducing minimal bias to the item profiles. We provide extensive experiments to demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method based on the three public datasets and one dataset that contains real-world CAT response data.
title Addressing Selection Bias in Computerized Adaptive Testing: A User-Wise Aggregate Influence Function Approach
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Computers and Society
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11912