MELT: Mining Effective Lightweight Transformations from Pull Requests
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Ramos, Daniel, Mitchell, Hailie, Lynce, Inês, Manquinho, Vasco, Martins, Ruben, Goues, Claire Le |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
SPELL: Synthesis of Programmatic Edits using LLMs
by: Ramos, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Ramos, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2026)
Counterexample Guided Program Repair Using Zero-Shot Learning and MaxSAT-based Fault Localization
by: Orvalho, Pedro, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Orvalho, Pedro, et al.
Published: (2024)
CFaults: Model-Based Diagnosis for Fault Localization in C Programs with Multiple Test Cases
by: Orvalho, Pedro, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Orvalho, Pedro, et al.
Published: (2024)
InvAASTCluster: On Applying Invariant-Based Program Clustering to Introductory Programming Assignments
by: Orvalho, Pedro, et al.
Published: (2022)
by: Orvalho, Pedro, et al.
Published: (2022)
Quality and Security Signals in AI-Generated Python Refactoring Pull Requests
by: Almukhtar, Mohamed, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Almukhtar, Mohamed, et al.
Published: (2026)
ProDebug: An Automated Debugging System for Prolog
by: Brancas, Ricardo, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Brancas, Ricardo, et al.
Published: (2026)
Analyzing Message-Code Inconsistency in AI Coding Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Gong, Jingzhi, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Gong, Jingzhi, et al.
Published: (2026)
Are Large Language Models Memorizing Bug Benchmarks?
by: Ramos, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Ramos, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2024)
SWE-PRBench: Benchmarking AI Code Review Quality Against Pull Request Feedback
by: Kumar, Deepak
Published: (2026)
by: Kumar, Deepak
Published: (2026)
Combining Logic with Large Language Models for Automatic Debugging and Repair of ASP Programs
by: Brancas, Ricardo, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Brancas, Ricardo, et al.
Published: (2024)
Why Are AI Agent Involved Pull Requests (Fix-Related) Remain Unmerged? An Empirical Study
by: Alam, Khairul, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Alam, Khairul, et al.
Published: (2026)
Predicting the First Response Latency of Maintainers and Contributors in Pull Requests
by: Khatoonabadi, SayedHassan, et al.
Published: (2023)
by: Khatoonabadi, SayedHassan, et al.
Published: (2023)
On Wasted Contributions: Understanding the Dynamics of Contributor-Abandoned Pull Requests
by: Khatoonabadi, SayedHassan, et al.
Published: (2021)
by: Khatoonabadi, SayedHassan, et al.
Published: (2021)
How AI Coding Agents Communicate: A Study of Pull Request Description Characteristics and Human Review Responses
by: Watanabe, Kan, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Watanabe, Kan, et al.
Published: (2026)
Where Do AI Coding Agents Fail? An Empirical Study of Failed Agentic Pull Requests in GitHub
by: Ehsani, Ramtin, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Ehsani, Ramtin, et al.
Published: (2026)
When AI Teammates Meet Code Review: Collaboration Signals Shaping the Integration of Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Nachuma, Costain, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Nachuma, Costain, et al.
Published: (2026)
Pull Requests as a Training Signal for Repo-Level Code Editing
by: Zhu, Qinglin, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Zhu, Qinglin, et al.
Published: (2026)
Model-Based Diagnosis with Multiple Observations: A Unified Approach for C Software and Boolean Circuits
by: Orvalho, Pedro, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Orvalho, Pedro, et al.
Published: (2025)
Understanding Automated Program Repair Agents Through the Lens of Traceability: An Empirical Study
by: Ceka, Ira, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Ceka, Ira, et al.
Published: (2025)
Can Automated Feedback Turn Students into Happy Prologians?
by: Brancas, Ricardo, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Brancas, Ricardo, et al.
Published: (2025)
The Value of Effective Pull Request Description
by: Pirouzkhah, Shirin, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Pirouzkhah, Shirin, et al.
Published: (2026)
TestForge: Feedback-Driven, Agentic Test Suite Generation
by: Jain, Kush, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Jain, Kush, et al.
Published: (2025)
More Code, Less Reuse: Investigating Code Quality and Reviewer Sentiment towards AI-generated Pull Requests
by: Huang, Haoming, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Huang, Haoming, et al.
Published: (2026)
How AI Coding Agents Modify Code: A Large-Scale Study of GitHub Pull Requests
by: Ogenrwot, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Ogenrwot, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2026)
Let's Make Every Pull Request Meaningful: An Empirical Analysis of Developer and Agentic Pull Requests
by: Yoshioka, Haruhiko, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Yoshioka, Haruhiko, et al.
Published: (2026)
GitSEED: A Git-backed Automated Assessment Tool for Software Engineering and Programming Education
by: Orvalho, Pedro, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Orvalho, Pedro, et al.
Published: (2024)
CUBES: A Parallel Synthesizer for SQL Using Examples
by: Brancas, Ricardo, et al.
Published: (2022)
by: Brancas, Ricardo, et al.
Published: (2022)
On Unified Prompt Tuning for Request Quality Assurance in Public Code Review
by: Chen, Xinyu, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Chen, Xinyu, et al.
Published: (2024)
CrashFixer: A crash resolution agent for the Linux kernel
by: Mathai, Alex, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Mathai, Alex, et al.
Published: (2025)
Automatic Design-Time Detection of Anomalies in Migrating Monolithic Applications to Microservices
by: Romão, Valentim, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Romão, Valentim, et al.
Published: (2025)
Knowledge-Guided Prompt Learning for Request Quality Assurance in Public Code Review
by: Li, Lin, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Li, Lin, et al.
Published: (2024)
AutoFeedback: An LLM-based Framework for Efficient and Accurate API Request Generation
by: Liu, Huanxi, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Liu, Huanxi, et al.
Published: (2024)
A Process Mining-Based System For The Analysis and Prediction of Software Development Workflows
by: Dorado, Antía, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Dorado, Antía, et al.
Published: (2025)
Revisiting Unnaturalness for Automated Program Repair in the Era of Large Language Models
by: Yang, Aidan Z. H., et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Yang, Aidan Z. H., et al.
Published: (2024)
Mining Software Repositories for Expert Recommendation
by: Marshall, Chad, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Marshall, Chad, et al.
Published: (2025)
Data Mining-Based Techniques for Software Fault Localization
by: Cellier, Peggy, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Cellier, Peggy, et al.
Published: (2025)
Empirical Analysis of Pull Requests for Google Summer of Code
by: Popoola, Saheed
Published: (2024)
by: Popoola, Saheed
Published: (2024)
GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2022)
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2022)
Insights into Security-Related AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Rabbi, Md Fazle, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Rabbi, Md Fazle, et al.
Published: (2026)
The Impact of Documentation on Test Engagement in Pull Requests in OSS
by: Amore, Teal, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Amore, Teal, et al.
Published: (2026)
Similar Items
-
SPELL: Synthesis of Programmatic Edits using LLMs
by: Ramos, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2026) -
Counterexample Guided Program Repair Using Zero-Shot Learning and MaxSAT-based Fault Localization
by: Orvalho, Pedro, et al.
Published: (2024) -
CFaults: Model-Based Diagnosis for Fault Localization in C Programs with Multiple Test Cases
by: Orvalho, Pedro, et al.
Published: (2024) -
InvAASTCluster: On Applying Invariant-Based Program Clustering to Introductory Programming Assignments
by: Orvalho, Pedro, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Quality and Security Signals in AI-Generated Python Refactoring Pull Requests
by: Almukhtar, Mohamed, et al.
Published: (2026)