Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.14840 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866929194788716544 |
|---|---|
| author | Barrett, Clark Boyd, Brad Burzstein, Elie Carlini, Nicholas Chen, Brad Choi, Jihye Chowdhury, Amrita Roy Christodorescu, Mihai Datta, Anupam Feizi, Soheil Fisher, Kathleen Hashimoto, Tatsunori Hendrycks, Dan Jha, Somesh Kang, Daniel Kerschbaum, Florian Mitchell, Eric Mitchell, John Ramzan, Zulfikar Shams, Khawaja Song, Dawn Taly, Ankur Yang, Diyi |
| author_facet | Barrett, Clark Boyd, Brad Burzstein, Elie Carlini, Nicholas Chen, Brad Choi, Jihye Chowdhury, Amrita Roy Christodorescu, Mihai Datta, Anupam Feizi, Soheil Fisher, Kathleen Hashimoto, Tatsunori Hendrycks, Dan Jha, Somesh Kang, Daniel Kerschbaum, Florian Mitchell, Eric Mitchell, John Ramzan, Zulfikar Shams, Khawaja Song, Dawn Taly, Ankur Yang, Diyi |
| contents | Every major technical invention resurfaces the dual-use dilemma -- the new technology has the potential to be used for good as well as for harm. Generative AI (GenAI) techniques, such as large language models (LLMs) and diffusion models, have shown remarkable capabilities (e.g., in-context learning, code-completion, and text-to-image generation and editing). However, GenAI can be used just as well by attackers to generate new attacks and increase the velocity and efficacy of existing attacks.
This paper reports the findings of a workshop held at Google (co-organized by Stanford University and the University of Wisconsin-Madison) on the dual-use dilemma posed by GenAI. This paper is not meant to be comprehensive, but is rather an attempt to synthesize some of the interesting findings from the workshop. We discuss short-term and long-term goals for the community on this topic. We hope this paper provides both a launching point for a discussion on this important topic as well as interesting problems that the research community can work to address. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2308_14840 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Identifying and Mitigating the Security Risks of Generative AI Barrett, Clark Boyd, Brad Burzstein, Elie Carlini, Nicholas Chen, Brad Choi, Jihye Chowdhury, Amrita Roy Christodorescu, Mihai Datta, Anupam Feizi, Soheil Fisher, Kathleen Hashimoto, Tatsunori Hendrycks, Dan Jha, Somesh Kang, Daniel Kerschbaum, Florian Mitchell, Eric Mitchell, John Ramzan, Zulfikar Shams, Khawaja Song, Dawn Taly, Ankur Yang, Diyi Artificial Intelligence Every major technical invention resurfaces the dual-use dilemma -- the new technology has the potential to be used for good as well as for harm. Generative AI (GenAI) techniques, such as large language models (LLMs) and diffusion models, have shown remarkable capabilities (e.g., in-context learning, code-completion, and text-to-image generation and editing). However, GenAI can be used just as well by attackers to generate new attacks and increase the velocity and efficacy of existing attacks. This paper reports the findings of a workshop held at Google (co-organized by Stanford University and the University of Wisconsin-Madison) on the dual-use dilemma posed by GenAI. This paper is not meant to be comprehensive, but is rather an attempt to synthesize some of the interesting findings from the workshop. We discuss short-term and long-term goals for the community on this topic. We hope this paper provides both a launching point for a discussion on this important topic as well as interesting problems that the research community can work to address. |
| title | Identifying and Mitigating the Security Risks of Generative AI |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.14840 |