Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hunt, Edmund R., Baber, Chris, Sobhani, Mehdi, Milivojevic, Sanja, Yusuf, Sagir, Musolesi, Mirco, Waterson, Patrick, Maynard, Sally
Format: Preprint
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.05378
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910307274719232
author Hunt, Edmund R.
Baber, Chris
Sobhani, Mehdi
Milivojevic, Sanja
Yusuf, Sagir
Musolesi, Mirco
Waterson, Patrick
Maynard, Sally
author_facet Hunt, Edmund R.
Baber, Chris
Sobhani, Mehdi
Milivojevic, Sanja
Yusuf, Sagir
Musolesi, Mirco
Waterson, Patrick
Maynard, Sally
contents Defining and measuring trust in dynamic, multiagent teams is important in a range of contexts, particularly in defense and security domains. Team members should be trusted to work towards agreed goals and in accordance with shared values. In this paper, our concern is with the definition of goals and values such that it is possible to define 'trust' in a way that is interpretable, and hence usable, by both humans and robots. We argue that the outcome of team activity can be considered in terms of 'goal', 'individual/team values', and 'legal principles'. We question whether alignment is possible at the level of 'individual/team values', or only at the 'goal' and 'legal principles' levels. We argue for a set of metrics to define trust in human-robot teams that are interpretable by human or robot team members, and consider an experiment that could demonstrate the notion of 'satisficing trust' over the course of a simulated mission.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2309_05378
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Steps Towards Satisficing Distributed Dynamic Team Trust
Hunt, Edmund R.
Baber, Chris
Sobhani, Mehdi
Milivojevic, Sanja
Yusuf, Sagir
Musolesi, Mirco
Waterson, Patrick
Maynard, Sally
Artificial Intelligence
Human-Computer Interaction
Robotics
Defining and measuring trust in dynamic, multiagent teams is important in a range of contexts, particularly in defense and security domains. Team members should be trusted to work towards agreed goals and in accordance with shared values. In this paper, our concern is with the definition of goals and values such that it is possible to define 'trust' in a way that is interpretable, and hence usable, by both humans and robots. We argue that the outcome of team activity can be considered in terms of 'goal', 'individual/team values', and 'legal principles'. We question whether alignment is possible at the level of 'individual/team values', or only at the 'goal' and 'legal principles' levels. We argue for a set of metrics to define trust in human-robot teams that are interpretable by human or robot team members, and consider an experiment that could demonstrate the notion of 'satisficing trust' over the course of a simulated mission.
title Steps Towards Satisficing Distributed Dynamic Team Trust
topic Artificial Intelligence
Human-Computer Interaction
Robotics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.05378