Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paligadu, Vivekanand, Johnson, Oliver, Aldridge, Matthew
Format: Preprint
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.07264
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866914970829062144
author Paligadu, Vivekanand
Johnson, Oliver
Aldridge, Matthew
author_facet Paligadu, Vivekanand
Johnson, Oliver
Aldridge, Matthew
contents We consider a version of the classical group testing problem motivated by PCR testing for COVID-19. In the so-called tropical group testing model, the outcome of a test is the lowest cycle threshold (Ct) level of the individuals pooled within it, rather than a simple binary indicator variable. We introduce the tropical counterparts of three classical non-adaptive algorithms (COMP, DD and SCOMP), and analyse their behaviour through both simulations and bounds on error probabilities. By comparing the results of the tropical and classical algorithms, we gain insight into the extra information provided by learning the outcomes (Ct levels) of the tests. We show that in a limiting regime the tropical COMP algorithm requires as many tests as its classical counterpart, but that for sufficiently dense problems tropical DD can recover more information with fewer tests, and can be viewed as essentially optimal in certain regimes.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2309_07264
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Small error algorithms for tropical group testing
Paligadu, Vivekanand
Johnson, Oliver
Aldridge, Matthew
Information Theory
Probability
We consider a version of the classical group testing problem motivated by PCR testing for COVID-19. In the so-called tropical group testing model, the outcome of a test is the lowest cycle threshold (Ct) level of the individuals pooled within it, rather than a simple binary indicator variable. We introduce the tropical counterparts of three classical non-adaptive algorithms (COMP, DD and SCOMP), and analyse their behaviour through both simulations and bounds on error probabilities. By comparing the results of the tropical and classical algorithms, we gain insight into the extra information provided by learning the outcomes (Ct levels) of the tests. We show that in a limiting regime the tropical COMP algorithm requires as many tests as its classical counterpart, but that for sufficiently dense problems tropical DD can recover more information with fewer tests, and can be viewed as essentially optimal in certain regimes.
title Small error algorithms for tropical group testing
topic Information Theory
Probability
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.07264