Fractal Compressive Sensing
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2023
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866916081704108032 |
|---|---|
| author | Lorenzana, Marlon Bran Cottier, Benjamin Marques, Matthew Kingston, Andrew Chandra, Shekhar S. |
| author_facet | Lorenzana, Marlon Bran Cottier, Benjamin Marques, Matthew Kingston, Andrew Chandra, Shekhar S. |
| contents | This paper introduces a sparse projection matrix composed of discrete (digital) periodic lines that create a pseudo-random (p.frac) sampling scheme. Our approach enables random Cartesian sampling whilst employing deterministic and one-dimensional (1D) trajectories derived from the discrete Radon transform (DRT). Unlike radial trajectories, DRT projections can be back-projected without interpolation. Thus, we also propose a novel reconstruction method based on the exact projections of the DRT called finite Fourier reconstruction (FFR). We term this combined p.frac and FFR strategy, finite compressive sensing (FCS), with image recovery demonstrated on experimental and simulated data; image quality comparisons are made with Cartesian random sampling in 1D and two-dimensional (2D), as well as radial under-sampling in a more constrained experiment. Our experiments indicate FCS enables 3-5dB gain in peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) for 2-, 4- and 8-fold under-sampling compared to 1D Cartesian random sampling. This paper aims to: Review common sampling strategies for compressed sensing (CS)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to inform the motivation of a projective and Cartesian sampling scheme. Compare the incoherence of these sampling strategies and the proposed p.frac. Compare reconstruction quality of the sampling schemes under various reconstruction strategies to determine the suitability of p.frac for CS-MRI. It is hypothesised that because p.frac is a highly incoherent sampling scheme, that reconstructions will be of high quality compared to 1D Cartesian phase-encode under-sampling. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2309_08641 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Fractal Compressive Sensing Lorenzana, Marlon Bran Cottier, Benjamin Marques, Matthew Kingston, Andrew Chandra, Shekhar S. Image and Video Processing Signal Processing This paper introduces a sparse projection matrix composed of discrete (digital) periodic lines that create a pseudo-random (p.frac) sampling scheme. Our approach enables random Cartesian sampling whilst employing deterministic and one-dimensional (1D) trajectories derived from the discrete Radon transform (DRT). Unlike radial trajectories, DRT projections can be back-projected without interpolation. Thus, we also propose a novel reconstruction method based on the exact projections of the DRT called finite Fourier reconstruction (FFR). We term this combined p.frac and FFR strategy, finite compressive sensing (FCS), with image recovery demonstrated on experimental and simulated data; image quality comparisons are made with Cartesian random sampling in 1D and two-dimensional (2D), as well as radial under-sampling in a more constrained experiment. Our experiments indicate FCS enables 3-5dB gain in peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) for 2-, 4- and 8-fold under-sampling compared to 1D Cartesian random sampling. This paper aims to: Review common sampling strategies for compressed sensing (CS)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to inform the motivation of a projective and Cartesian sampling scheme. Compare the incoherence of these sampling strategies and the proposed p.frac. Compare reconstruction quality of the sampling schemes under various reconstruction strategies to determine the suitability of p.frac for CS-MRI. It is hypothesised that because p.frac is a highly incoherent sampling scheme, that reconstructions will be of high quality compared to 1D Cartesian phase-encode under-sampling. |
| title | Fractal Compressive Sensing |
| topic | Image and Video Processing Signal Processing |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.08641 |