"AI enhances our performance, I have no doubt this one will do the same": The Placebo effect is robust to negative descriptions of AI
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866913204715651072 |
|---|---|
| author | Kloft, Agnes M. Welsch, Robin Kosch, Thomas Villa, Steeven |
| author_facet | Kloft, Agnes M. Welsch, Robin Kosch, Thomas Villa, Steeven |
| contents | Heightened AI expectations facilitate performance in human-AI interactions through placebo effects. While lowering expectations to control for placebo effects is advisable, overly negative expectations could induce nocebo effects. In a letter discrimination task, we informed participants that an AI would either increase or decrease their performance by adapting the interface, but in reality, no AI was present in any condition. A Bayesian analysis showed that participants had high expectations and performed descriptively better irrespective of the AI description when a sham-AI was present. Using cognitive modeling, we could trace this advantage back to participants gathering more information. A replication study verified that negative AI descriptions do not alter expectations, suggesting that performance expectations with AI are biased and robust to negative verbal descriptions. We discuss the impact of user expectations on AI interactions and evaluation and provide a behavioral placebo marker for human-AI interaction |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2309_16606 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | "AI enhances our performance, I have no doubt this one will do the same": The Placebo effect is robust to negative descriptions of AI Kloft, Agnes M. Welsch, Robin Kosch, Thomas Villa, Steeven Human-Computer Interaction Artificial Intelligence Heightened AI expectations facilitate performance in human-AI interactions through placebo effects. While lowering expectations to control for placebo effects is advisable, overly negative expectations could induce nocebo effects. In a letter discrimination task, we informed participants that an AI would either increase or decrease their performance by adapting the interface, but in reality, no AI was present in any condition. A Bayesian analysis showed that participants had high expectations and performed descriptively better irrespective of the AI description when a sham-AI was present. Using cognitive modeling, we could trace this advantage back to participants gathering more information. A replication study verified that negative AI descriptions do not alter expectations, suggesting that performance expectations with AI are biased and robust to negative verbal descriptions. We discuss the impact of user expectations on AI interactions and evaluation and provide a behavioral placebo marker for human-AI interaction |
| title | "AI enhances our performance, I have no doubt this one will do the same": The Placebo effect is robust to negative descriptions of AI |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.16606 |