Assumption violations in causal discovery and the robustness of score matching

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Montagna, Francesco, Mastakouri, Atalanti A., Eulig, Elias, Noceti, Nicoletta, Rosasco, Lorenzo, Janzing, Dominik, Aragam, Bryon, Locatello, Francesco
Format: Preprint
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912046765834240
author Montagna, Francesco
Mastakouri, Atalanti A.
Eulig, Elias
Noceti, Nicoletta
Rosasco, Lorenzo
Janzing, Dominik
Aragam, Bryon
Locatello, Francesco
author_facet Montagna, Francesco
Mastakouri, Atalanti A.
Eulig, Elias
Noceti, Nicoletta
Rosasco, Lorenzo
Janzing, Dominik
Aragam, Bryon
Locatello, Francesco
contents When domain knowledge is limited and experimentation is restricted by ethical, financial, or time constraints, practitioners turn to observational causal discovery methods to recover the causal structure, exploiting the statistical properties of their data. Because causal discovery without further assumptions is an ill-posed problem, each algorithm comes with its own set of usually untestable assumptions, some of which are hard to meet in real datasets. Motivated by these considerations, this paper extensively benchmarks the empirical performance of recent causal discovery methods on observational i.i.d. data generated under different background conditions, allowing for violations of the critical assumptions required by each selected approach. Our experimental findings show that score matching-based methods demonstrate surprising performance in the false positive and false negative rate of the inferred graph in these challenging scenarios, and we provide theoretical insights into their performance. This work is also the first effort to benchmark the stability of causal discovery algorithms with respect to the values of their hyperparameters. Finally, we hope this paper will set a new standard for the evaluation of causal discovery methods and can serve as an accessible entry point for practitioners interested in the field, highlighting the empirical implications of different algorithm choices.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2310_13387
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Assumption violations in causal discovery and the robustness of score matching
Montagna, Francesco
Mastakouri, Atalanti A.
Eulig, Elias
Noceti, Nicoletta
Rosasco, Lorenzo
Janzing, Dominik
Aragam, Bryon
Locatello, Francesco
Methodology
Machine Learning
When domain knowledge is limited and experimentation is restricted by ethical, financial, or time constraints, practitioners turn to observational causal discovery methods to recover the causal structure, exploiting the statistical properties of their data. Because causal discovery without further assumptions is an ill-posed problem, each algorithm comes with its own set of usually untestable assumptions, some of which are hard to meet in real datasets. Motivated by these considerations, this paper extensively benchmarks the empirical performance of recent causal discovery methods on observational i.i.d. data generated under different background conditions, allowing for violations of the critical assumptions required by each selected approach. Our experimental findings show that score matching-based methods demonstrate surprising performance in the false positive and false negative rate of the inferred graph in these challenging scenarios, and we provide theoretical insights into their performance. This work is also the first effort to benchmark the stability of causal discovery algorithms with respect to the values of their hyperparameters. Finally, we hope this paper will set a new standard for the evaluation of causal discovery methods and can serve as an accessible entry point for practitioners interested in the field, highlighting the empirical implications of different algorithm choices.
title Assumption violations in causal discovery and the robustness of score matching
topic Methodology
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.13387