Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.19124 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911890708365312 |
|---|---|
| author | Panourgia, Evangelia Plessas, Theodoros Balampanis, Ilias Spinellis, Diomidis |
| author_facet | Panourgia, Evangelia Plessas, Theodoros Balampanis, Ilias Spinellis, Diomidis |
| contents | The rising popularity of deep learning (DL) methods and techniques has invigorated interest in the topic of SE4DL (Software Engineering for Deep Learning), the application of software engineering (SE) practices on deep learning software. Despite the novel engineering challenges brought on by the data-driven and non-deterministic paradigm of DL software, little work has been invested into developing DL-targeted SE tools. On the other hand, tools tackling non-SE issues specific to DL are actively used and referred to under the umbrella term "MLOps (Machine Learning Operations) tools". Nevertheless, the available literature supports the utility of conventional SE tooling in DL software development. Building upon previous mining software repositories (MSR) research on tool usage in open-source software works, we identify conventional and MLOps tools adopted in popular applied DL projects that use Python as the main programming language. About 63\% of the GitHub repositories we examined contained at least one conventional SE tool. Software construction tools are the most widely adopted, while the opposite applies to management and maintenance tools. Relatively few MLOps tools were found to be use, with only 20 tools out of a sample of 74 used in at least one repository. The majority of them were open-source rather than proprietary. One of these tools, TensorBoard, was found to be adopted in about half of the repositories in our study. Consequently, the widespread use of conventional SE tooling demonstrates its relevance to DL software. Further research is recommended on the adoption of MLOps tooling, focusing on the relevance of particular tool types, the development of required tools, as well as ways to promote the use of already available tools. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2310_19124 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Good Tools are Half the Work: Tool Usage in Deep Learning Projects Panourgia, Evangelia Plessas, Theodoros Balampanis, Ilias Spinellis, Diomidis Software Engineering Machine Learning The rising popularity of deep learning (DL) methods and techniques has invigorated interest in the topic of SE4DL (Software Engineering for Deep Learning), the application of software engineering (SE) practices on deep learning software. Despite the novel engineering challenges brought on by the data-driven and non-deterministic paradigm of DL software, little work has been invested into developing DL-targeted SE tools. On the other hand, tools tackling non-SE issues specific to DL are actively used and referred to under the umbrella term "MLOps (Machine Learning Operations) tools". Nevertheless, the available literature supports the utility of conventional SE tooling in DL software development. Building upon previous mining software repositories (MSR) research on tool usage in open-source software works, we identify conventional and MLOps tools adopted in popular applied DL projects that use Python as the main programming language. About 63\% of the GitHub repositories we examined contained at least one conventional SE tool. Software construction tools are the most widely adopted, while the opposite applies to management and maintenance tools. Relatively few MLOps tools were found to be use, with only 20 tools out of a sample of 74 used in at least one repository. The majority of them were open-source rather than proprietary. One of these tools, TensorBoard, was found to be adopted in about half of the repositories in our study. Consequently, the widespread use of conventional SE tooling demonstrates its relevance to DL software. Further research is recommended on the adoption of MLOps tooling, focusing on the relevance of particular tool types, the development of required tools, as well as ways to promote the use of already available tools. |
| title | Good Tools are Half the Work: Tool Usage in Deep Learning Projects |
| topic | Software Engineering Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.19124 |