Primordial Orbital Alignment of Sednoids

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huang, Yukun, Gladman, Brett
Format: Preprint
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909108358086656
author Huang, Yukun
Gladman, Brett
author_facet Huang, Yukun
Gladman, Brett
contents We examined the past history of the three most detached TransNeptunian Objects (TNOs) -- Sedna, 2012 VP113, and Leleakuhonua (2015 TG387) -- the three clearest members of the dynamical class known as sednoids, with high perihelia distances $q$. By integrating backward their nominal (and a set of cloned) orbits for the Solar System's age, we surprisingly find that the only time all their apsidal lines tightly cluster was 4.5 Gyr ago, at perihelion longitude $\varpi$ of $200^\circ$. This "primordial alignment" is independent of the observational biases that contribute to the current on-sky clustering in the large-semimajor axis Kuiper Belt. If future sednoid discoveries confirm these findings, this strongly argues for an initial event during the planet formation epoch which imprinted this particular apsidal orientation on the early detached TNO population. Their apsidal orientations were then subsequently modified only by the simple precession from the 4 giant planets (and weakly by the galactic tide). If other sednoids also cluster around the same primordial value, various models suggesting a still present planet in the outer Solar System would be incompatible with this alignment. We inspected two scenarios that could potentially explain the primordial alignment. First, a rogue planet model (where another massive planet raises perihelia near its own longitude until ejection) naturally produces this signature. Alternatively, a close stellar passage early in Solar System history raises perihelia, but it is poor at creating strong apsidal clustering. We show that all other known $35<q<55$ au TNOs are either too perturbed or orbits are still too uncertain to provide evidence for or against this paradigm.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2310_20614
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Primordial Orbital Alignment of Sednoids
Huang, Yukun
Gladman, Brett
Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
We examined the past history of the three most detached TransNeptunian Objects (TNOs) -- Sedna, 2012 VP113, and Leleakuhonua (2015 TG387) -- the three clearest members of the dynamical class known as sednoids, with high perihelia distances $q$. By integrating backward their nominal (and a set of cloned) orbits for the Solar System's age, we surprisingly find that the only time all their apsidal lines tightly cluster was 4.5 Gyr ago, at perihelion longitude $\varpi$ of $200^\circ$. This "primordial alignment" is independent of the observational biases that contribute to the current on-sky clustering in the large-semimajor axis Kuiper Belt. If future sednoid discoveries confirm these findings, this strongly argues for an initial event during the planet formation epoch which imprinted this particular apsidal orientation on the early detached TNO population. Their apsidal orientations were then subsequently modified only by the simple precession from the 4 giant planets (and weakly by the galactic tide). If other sednoids also cluster around the same primordial value, various models suggesting a still present planet in the outer Solar System would be incompatible with this alignment. We inspected two scenarios that could potentially explain the primordial alignment. First, a rogue planet model (where another massive planet raises perihelia near its own longitude until ejection) naturally produces this signature. Alternatively, a close stellar passage early in Solar System history raises perihelia, but it is poor at creating strong apsidal clustering. We show that all other known $35<q<55$ au TNOs are either too perturbed or orbits are still too uncertain to provide evidence for or against this paradigm.
title Primordial Orbital Alignment of Sednoids
topic Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.20614