Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Buschmeier, Hendrik, Buhl, Heike M., Kern, Friederike, Grimminger, Angela, Beierling, Helen, Fisher, Josephine, Groß, André, Horwath, Ilona, Klowait, Nils, Lazarov, Stefan, Lenke, Michael, Lohmer, Vivien, Rohlfing, Katharina, Scharlau, Ingrid, Singh, Amit, Terfloth, Lutz, Vollmer, Anna-Lisa, Wang, Yu, Wilmes, Annedore, Wrede, Britta
Format: Preprint
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08760
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915645757587456
author Buschmeier, Hendrik
Buhl, Heike M.
Kern, Friederike
Grimminger, Angela
Beierling, Helen
Fisher, Josephine
Groß, André
Horwath, Ilona
Klowait, Nils
Lazarov, Stefan
Lenke, Michael
Lohmer, Vivien
Rohlfing, Katharina
Scharlau, Ingrid
Singh, Amit
Terfloth, Lutz
Vollmer, Anna-Lisa
Wang, Yu
Wilmes, Annedore
Wrede, Britta
author_facet Buschmeier, Hendrik
Buhl, Heike M.
Kern, Friederike
Grimminger, Angela
Beierling, Helen
Fisher, Josephine
Groß, André
Horwath, Ilona
Klowait, Nils
Lazarov, Stefan
Lenke, Michael
Lohmer, Vivien
Rohlfing, Katharina
Scharlau, Ingrid
Singh, Amit
Terfloth, Lutz
Vollmer, Anna-Lisa
Wang, Yu
Wilmes, Annedore
Wrede, Britta
contents Explainability has become an important topic in computer science and artificial intelligence, leading to a subfield called Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). The goal of providing or seeking explanations is to achieve (better) 'understanding' on the part of the explainee. However, what it means to 'understand' is still not clearly defined, and the concept itself is rarely the subject of scientific investigation. This conceptual article aims to present a model of forms of understanding for XAI-explanations and beyond. From an interdisciplinary perspective bringing together computer science, linguistics, sociology, philosophy and psychology, a definition of understanding and its forms, assessment, and dynamics during the process of giving everyday explanations are explored. Two types of understanding are considered as possible outcomes of explanations, namely enabledness, 'knowing how' to do or decide something, and comprehension, 'knowing that' -- both in different degrees (from shallow to deep). Explanations regularly start with shallow understanding in a specific domain and can lead to deep comprehension and enabledness of the explanandum, which we see as a prerequisite for human users to gain agency. In this process, the increase of comprehension and enabledness are highly interdependent. Against the background of this systematization, special challenges of understanding in XAI are discussed.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2311_08760
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Forms of Understanding for XAI-Explanations
Buschmeier, Hendrik
Buhl, Heike M.
Kern, Friederike
Grimminger, Angela
Beierling, Helen
Fisher, Josephine
Groß, André
Horwath, Ilona
Klowait, Nils
Lazarov, Stefan
Lenke, Michael
Lohmer, Vivien
Rohlfing, Katharina
Scharlau, Ingrid
Singh, Amit
Terfloth, Lutz
Vollmer, Anna-Lisa
Wang, Yu
Wilmes, Annedore
Wrede, Britta
Artificial Intelligence
Explainability has become an important topic in computer science and artificial intelligence, leading to a subfield called Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). The goal of providing or seeking explanations is to achieve (better) 'understanding' on the part of the explainee. However, what it means to 'understand' is still not clearly defined, and the concept itself is rarely the subject of scientific investigation. This conceptual article aims to present a model of forms of understanding for XAI-explanations and beyond. From an interdisciplinary perspective bringing together computer science, linguistics, sociology, philosophy and psychology, a definition of understanding and its forms, assessment, and dynamics during the process of giving everyday explanations are explored. Two types of understanding are considered as possible outcomes of explanations, namely enabledness, 'knowing how' to do or decide something, and comprehension, 'knowing that' -- both in different degrees (from shallow to deep). Explanations regularly start with shallow understanding in a specific domain and can lead to deep comprehension and enabledness of the explanandum, which we see as a prerequisite for human users to gain agency. In this process, the increase of comprehension and enabledness are highly interdependent. Against the background of this systematization, special challenges of understanding in XAI are discussed.
title Forms of Understanding for XAI-Explanations
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08760