Copertina

Explaining Explanation: An Empirical Study on Explanation in Code Reviews

Fuente: arXiv

Salvato in:

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali:	Widyasari, Ratnadira, Zhang, Ting, Bouraffa, Abir, Maalej, Walid, Lo, David
Natura:	Preprint
Pubblicazione:	2023
Soggetti:	Software Engineering
Accesso online:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Aggiungi Tag Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

Documenti analoghi

How Do Developers Use Code Suggestions in Pull Request Reviews?
di: Bouraffa, Abir, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Not One to Rule Them All: Mining Meaningful Code Review Orders From GitHub
di: Bouraffa, Abir, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Beyond ChatGPT: Enhancing Software Quality Assurance Tasks with Diverse LLMs and Validation Techniques
di: Widyasari, Ratnadira, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Evaluating SZZ Implementations: An Empirical Study on the Linux Kernel
di: Lyu, Yunbo, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

Debt Behind the AI Boom: A Large-Scale Empirical Study of AI-Generated Code in the Wild
di: Liu, Yue, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Demystifying Faulty Code with LLM: Step-by-Step Reasoning for Explainable Fault Localization
di: Widyasari, Ratnadira, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

On Fun for Teaching Large Programming Courses
di: Maalej, Walid
Pubblicazione: (2026)

An Exploratory Study of Documentation Strategies for Product Features in Popular GitHub Projects
di: Puhlfürß, Tim, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2022)

Model Cards Revisited: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice for Ethical AI Requirements
di: Puhlfürß, Tim, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Mining Issue Trackers: Concepts and Techniques
di: Montgomery, Lloyd, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Smells Depend on the Context: An Interview Study of Issue Tracking Problems and Smells in Practice
di: Montgomery, Lloyd, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Does GenAI Make Usability Testing Obsolete?
di: Pourasad, Ali Ebrahimi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

A Systematic Literature Review on Explainability for Machine/Deep Learning-based Software Engineering Research
di: Cao, Sicong, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Multilingual Crowd-Based Requirements Engineering Using Large Language Models
di: Pilone, Arthur, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Can Developers Prompt? A Controlled Experiment for Code Documentation Generation
di: Kruse, Hans-Alexander, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

LessLeak-Bench: A First Investigation of Data Leakage in LLMs Across 83 Software Engineering Benchmarks
di: Zhou, Xin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

An Explanation of Software Architecture Explanations
di: Rukmono, Satrio Adi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Back to the Basics: Rethinking Issue-Commit Linking with LLM-Assisted Retrieval
di: Huang, Huihui, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

AgentSZZ: Teaching the LLM Agent to Play Detective with Bug-Inducing Commits
di: Lyu, Yunbo, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Revisiting Vulnerability Patch Identification on Data in the Wild
di: Irsan, Ivana Clairine, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Mapping NVD Records to Their Vulnerability-fixing Commits: How Hard is It?
di: Nguyen, Huu Hung, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

On the Automated Processing of User Feedback
di: Maalej, Walid, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Let the Trial Begin: A Mock-Court Approach to Vulnerability Detection using LLM-Based Agents
di: Widyasari, Ratnadira, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

FeedAIde: Guiding App Users to Submit Rich Feedback Reports by Asking Context-Aware Follow-Up Questions
di: Pourasad, Ali Ebrahimi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

LikeThis! Empowering App Users to Submit UI Improvement Suggestions Instead of Complaints
di: Wei, Jialiang, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Automatic Generation of Explainability Requirements and Software Explanations From User Reviews
di: Obaidi, Martin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

CleanVul: Automatic Function-Level Vulnerability Detection in Code Commits Using LLM Heuristics
di: Li, Yikun, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Automating Explanation Need Management in App Reviews: A Case Study from the Navigation App Industry
di: Obaidi, Martin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

BugsInPy: A Database of Existing Bugs in Python Programs to Enable Controlled Testing and Debugging Studies
di: Widyasari, Ratnadira, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study
di: Aðalsteinsson, Fannar Steinn, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

An Empirical Study of Static Analysis Tools for Secure Code Review
di: Charoenwet, Wachiraphan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Selective Shot Learning for Code Explanation
di: Bhattacharya, Paheli, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Toward Effective Secure Code Reviews: An Empirical Study of Security-Related Coding Weaknesses
di: Charoenwet, Wachiraphan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

From Industry Claims to Empirical Reality: An Empirical Study of Code Review Agents in Pull Requests
di: Chowdhury, Kowshik, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

An Empirical Study on Code Review Activity Prediction and Its Impact in Practice
di: Olewicki, Doriane, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Enhancing COBOL Code Explanations: A Multi-Agents Approach Using Large Language Models
di: Lei, Fangjian, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Aligning Academia with Industry: An Empirical Study of Industrial Needs and Academic Capabilities in AI-Driven Software Engineering
di: Yu, Hang, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

LLM-Assisted Empirical Software Engineering: Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda
di: Gomes, Victoria, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

An Empirical Study of False Negatives and Positives of Static Code Analyzers From the Perspective of Historical Issues
di: Cui, Han, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Towards Human-interpretable Explanation in Code Clone Detection using LLM-based Post Hoc Explainer
di: Racharak, Teeradaj, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)