Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09196 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866916507832811520 |
|---|---|
| author | Pena, Caroline MacCarron, Pádraig O'Sullivan, David J. P. |
| author_facet | Pena, Caroline MacCarron, Pádraig O'Sullivan, David J. P. |
| contents | The analysis of social networks enables the understanding of social interactions, polarisation of ideas, and the spread of information and therefore plays an important role in society. We use Twitter data - as it is a popular venue for the expression of opinion and dissemination of information - to identify opposing sides of a debate and, importantly, to observe how information spreads between these groups in our current polarised climate.
To achieve this, we collected over 688,000 Tweets from the Irish Abortion Referendum of 2018 to build a conversation network from users mentions with sentiment-based homophily. From this network, community detection methods allow us to isolate yes- or no-aligned supporters with high accuracy (90.9%). We supplement this by tracking how information cascades spread via over 31,000 retweet-cascades. We found that very little information spread between polarised communities. This provides a valuable methodology for extracting and studying information diffusion on large networks by isolating ideologically polarised groups and exploring the propagation of information within and between these groups. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2311_09196 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Finding polarised communities and tracking information diffusion on Twitter: The Irish Abortion Referendum Pena, Caroline MacCarron, Pádraig O'Sullivan, David J. P. Social and Information Networks The analysis of social networks enables the understanding of social interactions, polarisation of ideas, and the spread of information and therefore plays an important role in society. We use Twitter data - as it is a popular venue for the expression of opinion and dissemination of information - to identify opposing sides of a debate and, importantly, to observe how information spreads between these groups in our current polarised climate. To achieve this, we collected over 688,000 Tweets from the Irish Abortion Referendum of 2018 to build a conversation network from users mentions with sentiment-based homophily. From this network, community detection methods allow us to isolate yes- or no-aligned supporters with high accuracy (90.9%). We supplement this by tracking how information cascades spread via over 31,000 retweet-cascades. We found that very little information spread between polarised communities. This provides a valuable methodology for extracting and studying information diffusion on large networks by isolating ideologically polarised groups and exploring the propagation of information within and between these groups. |
| title | Finding polarised communities and tracking information diffusion on Twitter: The Irish Abortion Referendum |
| topic | Social and Information Networks |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09196 |