Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahari, Robert, Stammbach, Dominik, Ash, Elliott, Pentland, Alex `Sandy'
Format: Preprint
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09356
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912053624569856
author Mahari, Robert
Stammbach, Dominik
Ash, Elliott
Pentland, Alex `Sandy'
author_facet Mahari, Robert
Stammbach, Dominik
Ash, Elliott
Pentland, Alex `Sandy'
contents We present the Legal Passage Retrieval Dataset LePaRD. LePaRD is a massive collection of U.S. federal judicial citations to precedent in context. The dataset aims to facilitate work on legal passage prediction, a challenging practice-oriented legal retrieval and reasoning task. Legal passage prediction seeks to predict relevant passages from precedential court decisions given the context of a legal argument. We extensively evaluate various retrieval approaches on LePaRD, and find that classification appears to work best. However, we note that legal precedent prediction is a difficult task, and there remains significant room for improvement. We hope that by publishing LePaRD, we will encourage others to engage with a legal NLP task that promises to help expand access to justice by reducing the burden associated with legal research. A subset of the LePaRD dataset is freely available and the whole dataset will be released upon publication.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2311_09356
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle LePaRD: A Large-Scale Dataset of Judges Citing Precedents
Mahari, Robert
Stammbach, Dominik
Ash, Elliott
Pentland, Alex `Sandy'
Computation and Language
We present the Legal Passage Retrieval Dataset LePaRD. LePaRD is a massive collection of U.S. federal judicial citations to precedent in context. The dataset aims to facilitate work on legal passage prediction, a challenging practice-oriented legal retrieval and reasoning task. Legal passage prediction seeks to predict relevant passages from precedential court decisions given the context of a legal argument. We extensively evaluate various retrieval approaches on LePaRD, and find that classification appears to work best. However, we note that legal precedent prediction is a difficult task, and there remains significant room for improvement. We hope that by publishing LePaRD, we will encourage others to engage with a legal NLP task that promises to help expand access to justice by reducing the burden associated with legal research. A subset of the LePaRD dataset is freely available and the whole dataset will be released upon publication.
title LePaRD: A Large-Scale Dataset of Judges Citing Precedents
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09356