Copertina

Peer Reviews of Peer Reviews: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Other Experiments

Fuente: arXiv

Salvato in:

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali:	Goldberg, Alexander, Stelmakh, Ivan, Cho, Kyunghyun, Oh, Alice, Agarwal, Alekh, Belgrave, Danielle, Shah, Nihar B.
Natura:	Preprint
Pubblicazione:	2023
Soggetti:	Digital Libraries Computer Science and Game Theory
Accesso online:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Aggiungi Tag Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

Documenti analoghi

A Randomized Controlled Trial on Anonymizing Reviewers to Each Other in Peer Review Discussions
di: Rastogi, Charvi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Causal Effect of Group Diversity on Redundancy and Coverage in Peer-Reviewing
di: Goyal, Navita, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review
di: Su, Buxin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

A Principled Approach to Randomized Selection under Uncertainty: Applications to Peer Review and Grant Funding
di: Goldberg, Alexander, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Detecting LLM-Generated Peer Reviews
di: Rao, Vishisht, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

ML Researchers Support Openness in Peer Review But Are Concerned About Resubmission Bias
di: Rao, Vishisht, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

DecentPeeR: A Self-Incentivised & Inclusive Decentralized Peer Review System
di: Gruendler, Johannes, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Identity Theft in AI Conference Peer Review
di: Shah, Nihar B., et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Enhancing Peer Review in Astronomy: A Machine Learning and Optimization Approach to Reviewer Assignments for ALMA
di: Carpenter, John M., et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

A Gold Standard Dataset for the Reviewer Assignment Problem
di: Stelmakh, Ivan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

Rejoinder: The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review
di: Su, Buxin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

On The Peer Review Reports: Does Size Matter?
di: Maddi, Abdelghani, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

To ArXiv or not to ArXiv: A Study Quantifying Pros and Cons of Posting Preprints Online
di: Rastogi, Charvi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2022)

Deferred Acceptance Algorithm Improves Peer Review Process
di: Bartneck, Christoph, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

How to Find Fantastic AI Papers: Self-Rankings as a Powerful Predictor of Scientific Impact Beyond Peer Review
di: Su, Buxin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

R-Index: A Metric for Assessing Researcher Contributions to Peer Review
di: Malekzadeh, Milad
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Smooth Partial Lotteries for Stable Randomized Selection
di: Goldberg, Alexander, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

ARA: Agentic Reproducibility Assessment For Scalable Support Of Scientific Peer-Review
di: Riehl, Kevin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Commitment Checklist: Auditing Author Commitments in Peer Review
di: Chen, Chung-Chi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Vulnerability of Text-Matching in ML/AI Conference Reviewer Assignments to Collusions
di: Hsieh, Jhih-Yi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Gender and Discipline Shape Length, Content and Tone of Grant Peer Review Reports
di: Müller, Stefan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Can Large Language Models Evaluate Grant Proposal Quality? Revisiting the Wennerås and Wold Peer Review Data
di: Sandström, Ulf, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Trends in Practical Student Peer-review
di: Purchase, Helen C., et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis
di: Yu, Jianxiang, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Evaluating the Predictive Capacity of ChatGPT for Academic Peer Review Outcomes Across Multiple Platforms
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Group Fairness in Peer Review
di: Aziz, Haris, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS'24 Experiment
di: Goldberg, Alexander, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Liberata -- Graph Scientometrics for a Share Based System of Academic Publishing
di: Zhang, Han, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Pre-review to Peer review: Pitfalls of Automating Reviews using Large Language Models
di: Akella, Akhil Pandey, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

The More You Automate, the Less You See: Hidden Pitfalls of AI Scientist Systems
di: Luo, Ziming, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Compound Deception in Elite Peer Review: A Failure Mode Taxonomy of 100 Fabricated Citations at NeurIPS 2025
di: Ansari, Samar
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Paper Copilot: Tracking the Evolution of Peer Review in AI Conferences
di: Yang, Jing, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Survey with game development companies on personal data protection
di: da Silva, Mônica, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

A System-Level Analysis of Conference Peer Review
di: Zhang, Yichi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

Can We Volunteer Out of the Peer Review Crisis?
di: Tang, Theo, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Peer-to-Peer Network: Kantian Cooperation Discourage Free Riding
di: Mane, Pramod C., et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

The use of digital games in the professional training of social pedagogues: realities and perspectives
di: Nadiia Chernukha
Pubblicazione: (2022)

FLAWS: A Benchmark for Error Identification and Localization in Scientific Papers
di: Xi, Sarina, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Position: The Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Community Should Adopt a More Transparent and Regulated Peer Review Process
di: Yang, Jing
Pubblicazione: (2025)

A design process for balanced educational video games with collaborative activities
di: Natalia Padilla-Zea
Pubblicazione: (2015)