Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qiu, Haoyi, Huang, Kung-Hsiang, Qu, Jingnong, Peng, Nanyun
Format: Preprint
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09521
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910631518535680
author Qiu, Haoyi
Huang, Kung-Hsiang
Qu, Jingnong
Peng, Nanyun
author_facet Qiu, Haoyi
Huang, Kung-Hsiang
Qu, Jingnong
Peng, Nanyun
contents Ensuring factual consistency is crucial for natural language generation tasks, particularly in abstractive summarization, where preserving the integrity of information is paramount. Prior works on evaluating factual consistency of summarization often take the entailment-based approaches that first generate perturbed (factual inconsistent) summaries and then train a classifier on the generated data to detect the factually inconsistencies during testing time. However, previous approaches generating perturbed summaries are either of low coherence or lack error-type coverage. To address these issues, we propose AMRFact, a framework that generates perturbed summaries using Abstract Meaning Representations (AMRs). Our approach parses factually consistent summaries into AMR graphs and injects controlled factual inconsistencies to create negative examples, allowing for coherent factually inconsistent summaries to be generated with high error-type coverage. Additionally, we present a data selection module NegFilter based on natural language inference and BARTScore to ensure the quality of the generated negative samples. Experimental results demonstrate our approach significantly outperforms previous systems on the AggreFact-SOTA benchmark, showcasing its efficacy in evaluating factuality of abstractive summarization.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2311_09521
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle AMRFact: Enhancing Summarization Factuality Evaluation with AMR-Driven Negative Samples Generation
Qiu, Haoyi
Huang, Kung-Hsiang
Qu, Jingnong
Peng, Nanyun
Computation and Language
Ensuring factual consistency is crucial for natural language generation tasks, particularly in abstractive summarization, where preserving the integrity of information is paramount. Prior works on evaluating factual consistency of summarization often take the entailment-based approaches that first generate perturbed (factual inconsistent) summaries and then train a classifier on the generated data to detect the factually inconsistencies during testing time. However, previous approaches generating perturbed summaries are either of low coherence or lack error-type coverage. To address these issues, we propose AMRFact, a framework that generates perturbed summaries using Abstract Meaning Representations (AMRs). Our approach parses factually consistent summaries into AMR graphs and injects controlled factual inconsistencies to create negative examples, allowing for coherent factually inconsistent summaries to be generated with high error-type coverage. Additionally, we present a data selection module NegFilter based on natural language inference and BARTScore to ensure the quality of the generated negative samples. Experimental results demonstrate our approach significantly outperforms previous systems on the AggreFact-SOTA benchmark, showcasing its efficacy in evaluating factuality of abstractive summarization.
title AMRFact: Enhancing Summarization Factuality Evaluation with AMR-Driven Negative Samples Generation
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09521