Examining bias perpetuation in academic search engines: an algorithm audit of Google and Semantic Scholar
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2023
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866929652482703360 |
|---|---|
| author | Kacperski, Celina Bielig, Mona Makhortykh, Mykola Sydorova, Maryna Ulloa, Roberto |
| author_facet | Kacperski, Celina Bielig, Mona Makhortykh, Mykola Sydorova, Maryna Ulloa, Roberto |
| contents | Researchers rely on academic Web search engines to find scientific sources, but search engine mechanisms may selectively present content that aligns with biases embedded in queries. This study examines whether confirmation biased queries prompted into Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar will yield results aligned with a query's bias. Six queries (topics across health and technology domains such as vaccines, Internet use) were analyzed for disparities in search results. We confirm that biased queries (targeting benefits or risks) affect search results in line with bias, with technology-related queries displaying more significant disparities. Overall, Semantic Scholar exhibited fewer disparities than Google Scholar. Topics rated as more polarizing did not consistently show more disparate results. Academic search results that perpetuate confirmation bias have strong implications for both researchers and citizens searching for evidence. More research is needed to explore how scientific inquiry and academic search engines interact. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2311_09969 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Examining bias perpetuation in academic search engines: an algorithm audit of Google and Semantic Scholar Kacperski, Celina Bielig, Mona Makhortykh, Mykola Sydorova, Maryna Ulloa, Roberto Computers and Society Researchers rely on academic Web search engines to find scientific sources, but search engine mechanisms may selectively present content that aligns with biases embedded in queries. This study examines whether confirmation biased queries prompted into Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar will yield results aligned with a query's bias. Six queries (topics across health and technology domains such as vaccines, Internet use) were analyzed for disparities in search results. We confirm that biased queries (targeting benefits or risks) affect search results in line with bias, with technology-related queries displaying more significant disparities. Overall, Semantic Scholar exhibited fewer disparities than Google Scholar. Topics rated as more polarizing did not consistently show more disparate results. Academic search results that perpetuate confirmation bias have strong implications for both researchers and citizens searching for evidence. More research is needed to explore how scientific inquiry and academic search engines interact. |
| title | Examining bias perpetuation in academic search engines: an algorithm audit of Google and Semantic Scholar |
| topic | Computers and Society |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09969 |