Bounds on Representation-Induced Confounding Bias for Treatment Effect Estimation

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melnychuk, Valentyn, Frauen, Dennis, Feuerriegel, Stefan
Format: Preprint
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915855246295040
author Melnychuk, Valentyn
Frauen, Dennis
Feuerriegel, Stefan
author_facet Melnychuk, Valentyn
Frauen, Dennis
Feuerriegel, Stefan
contents State-of-the-art methods for conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimation make widespread use of representation learning. Here, the idea is to reduce the variance of the low-sample CATE estimation by a (potentially constrained) low-dimensional representation. However, low-dimensional representations can lose information about the observed confounders and thus lead to bias, because of which the validity of representation learning for CATE estimation is typically violated. In this paper, we propose a new, representation-agnostic refutation framework for estimating bounds on the representation-induced confounding bias that comes from dimensionality reduction (or other constraints on the representations) in CATE estimation. First, we establish theoretically under which conditions CATE is non-identifiable given low-dimensional (constrained) representations. Second, as our remedy, we propose a neural refutation framework which performs partial identification of CATE or, equivalently, aims at estimating lower and upper bounds of the representation-induced confounding bias. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our bounds in a series of experiments. In sum, our refutation framework is of direct relevance in practice where the validity of CATE estimation is of importance.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2311_11321
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Bounds on Representation-Induced Confounding Bias for Treatment Effect Estimation
Melnychuk, Valentyn
Frauen, Dennis
Feuerriegel, Stefan
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
State-of-the-art methods for conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimation make widespread use of representation learning. Here, the idea is to reduce the variance of the low-sample CATE estimation by a (potentially constrained) low-dimensional representation. However, low-dimensional representations can lose information about the observed confounders and thus lead to bias, because of which the validity of representation learning for CATE estimation is typically violated. In this paper, we propose a new, representation-agnostic refutation framework for estimating bounds on the representation-induced confounding bias that comes from dimensionality reduction (or other constraints on the representations) in CATE estimation. First, we establish theoretically under which conditions CATE is non-identifiable given low-dimensional (constrained) representations. Second, as our remedy, we propose a neural refutation framework which performs partial identification of CATE or, equivalently, aims at estimating lower and upper bounds of the representation-induced confounding bias. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our bounds in a series of experiments. In sum, our refutation framework is of direct relevance in practice where the validity of CATE estimation is of importance.
title Bounds on Representation-Induced Confounding Bias for Treatment Effect Estimation
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.11321