Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Lacombe, Osmin, Mukohyama, Shinji, Seitz, Josef
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2023
Soggetti:
Accesso online:https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12925
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866929370708312064
author Lacombe, Osmin
Mukohyama, Shinji
Seitz, Josef
author_facet Lacombe, Osmin
Mukohyama, Shinji
Seitz, Josef
contents We examine $f(R, \text{Matter})$ theories that directly couple the curvature $R$ or $R_{μν}$ with the matter sector in the action, in addition to the universal coupling. We argue that if the matter sector includes the Standard Model (SM), such theories are either inconsistent or already excluded by experiments unless they are a rewriting of $f(R)$ gravity or general relativity. If these theories genuinely couple the SM to curvature, they suffer from the presence of ghost states at energies within their domain of application for cosmological purposes. Therefore, we raise questions about their relevance to cosmology. Moreover, if such theories do not include the SM, they should just be seen as scalar-tensor, vector-tensor, ..., theories, depending on the additional degrees of freedom. They should thus be studied accordingly.}
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2311_12925
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Are $f(R, {\rm Matter})$ theories really relevant to cosmology?
Lacombe, Osmin
Mukohyama, Shinji
Seitz, Josef
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
High Energy Physics - Theory
We examine $f(R, \text{Matter})$ theories that directly couple the curvature $R$ or $R_{μν}$ with the matter sector in the action, in addition to the universal coupling. We argue that if the matter sector includes the Standard Model (SM), such theories are either inconsistent or already excluded by experiments unless they are a rewriting of $f(R)$ gravity or general relativity. If these theories genuinely couple the SM to curvature, they suffer from the presence of ghost states at energies within their domain of application for cosmological purposes. Therefore, we raise questions about their relevance to cosmology. Moreover, if such theories do not include the SM, they should just be seen as scalar-tensor, vector-tensor, ..., theories, depending on the additional degrees of freedom. They should thus be studied accordingly.}
title Are $f(R, {\rm Matter})$ theories really relevant to cosmology?
topic General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
High Energy Physics - Theory
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12925