Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2023
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.15758 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Inhaltsangabe:
- In a two dimensional annulus $A_ρ=\{x\in \mathbb R^2: ρ<|x|<1\}$, $ρ\in (0,1)$, we characterize $0$-homogeneous minimizers, in $H^1(A_ρ;\mathbb S^1)$ with respect to their own boundary conditions, of the anisotropic energy \begin{equation*} E_δ(u)=\int_{A_ρ} |\nabla u|^2 +δ\left( (\nabla\cdot u)^2-(\nabla\times u)^2\right) \, dx,\quad δ\in (-1,1). \end{equation*} Even for a small anisotropy $0<|δ|\ll 1$, we exhibit qualitative properties very different from the isotropic case $δ=0$. In particular, $0$-homogeneous critical points of degree $d\notin \lbrace 0,1,2\rbrace$ are always local minimizers, but in thick annuli ($ρ\ll 1$) they are not minimizers: the $0$-homogeneous symmetry is broken. One corollary is that entire solutions to the anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau system have a far-field behavior very different from the isotropic case studied by Brezis, Merle and Rivière. The tools we use include: ODE and variational arguments; asymptotic expansions, interpolation inequalities and explicit computations involving near-optimizers of these inequalities for proving that $0$-homogeneous critical points are not minimizers in thick annuli.