Cover Image

Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMs

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Smit, Andries, Duckworth, Paul, Grinsztajn, Nathan, Barrett, Thomas D., Pretorius, Arnu
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2023
Subjects:	Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Memory-Enhanced Neural Solvers for Routing Problems
by: Chalumeau, Felix, et al.
Published: (2024)

Combinatorial Optimization with Policy Adaptation using Latent Space Search
by: Chalumeau, Felix, et al.
Published: (2023)

MAD-Fact: A Multi-Agent Debate Framework for Long-Form Factuality Evaluation in LLMs
by: Ning, Yucheng, et al.
Published: (2025)

S$^2$-MAD: Breaking the Token Barrier to Enhance Multi-Agent Debate Efficiency
by: Zeng, Yuting, et al.
Published: (2025)

M-MAD: Multidimensional Multi-Agent Debate for Advanced Machine Translation Evaluation
by: Feng, Zhaopeng, et al.
Published: (2024)

iMAD: Intelligent Multi-Agent Debate for Efficient and Accurate LLM Inference
by: Fan, Wei, et al.
Published: (2025)

MAD-OPD: Breaking the Ceiling in On-Policy Distillation via Multi-Agent Debate
by: Wang, Jianze, et al.
Published: (2026)

Selective Reincarnation: Offline-to-Online Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
by: Formanek, Claude, et al.
Published: (2023)

Putting Data at the Centre of Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
by: Formanek, Claude, et al.
Published: (2024)

GroupDebate: Enhancing the Efficiency of Multi-Agent Debate Using Group Discussion
by: Liu, Tongxuan, et al.
Published: (2024)

Combating Adversarial Attacks with Multi-Agent Debate
by: Chern, Steffi, et al.
Published: (2024)

Dynamic Role Assignment for Multi-Agent Debate
by: Zhang, Miao, et al.
Published: (2026)

Generative Model for Small Molecules with Latent Space RL Fine-Tuning to Protein Targets
by: Sob, Ulrich A. Mbou, et al.
Published: (2024)

MAD-Sherlock: Multi-Agent Debate for Visual Misinformation Detection
by: Lakara, Kumud, et al.
Published: (2024)

Free-MAD: Consensus-Free Multi-Agent Debate
by: Cui, Yu, et al.
Published: (2025)

MADIAVE: Multi-Agent Debate for Implicit Attribute Value Extraction
by: Huang, Wei-Chieh, et al.
Published: (2025)

Learning to Break: Knowledge-Enhanced Reasoning in Multi-Agent Debate System
by: Wang, Haotian, et al.
Published: (2023)

CascadeDebate: Multi-Agent Deliberation for Cost-Aware LLM Cascades
by: Chang, Raeyoung, et al.
Published: (2026)

ReviewerToo: Should AI Join The Program Committee? A Look At The Future of Peer Review
by: Sahu, Gaurav, et al.
Published: (2025)

Fundamental Problems With Model Editing: How Should Rational Belief Revision Work in LLMs?
by: Hase, Peter, et al.
Published: (2024)

LLMs Should Incorporate Explicit Mechanisms for Human Empathy
by: You, Xiaoxing, et al.
Published: (2026)

Gradual Vigilance and Interval Communication: Enhancing Value Alignment in Multi-Agent Debates
by: Zou, Rui, et al.
Published: (2024)

Voting or Consensus? Decision-Making in Multi-Agent Debate
by: Kaesberg, Lars Benedikt, et al.
Published: (2025)

A Closer Look into LLMs for Table Understanding
by: Wang, Jia, et al.
Published: (2026)

Preference Curriculum: LLMs Should Always Be Pretrained on Their Preferred Data
by: Zhang, Xuemiao, et al.
Published: (2025)

HarmTransform: Transforming Explicit Harmful Queries into Stealthy via Multi-Agent Debate
by: Zhu, Shenzhe
Published: (2025)

Debate-to-Write: A Persona-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Diverse Argument Generation
by: Hu, Zhe, et al.
Published: (2024)

Can Large Language Models be Trusted for Evaluation? Scalable Meta-Evaluation of LLMs as Evaluators via Agent Debate
by: Chern, Steffi, et al.
Published: (2024)

LLMs Should Express Uncertainty Explicitly
by: Guo, Junyu, et al.
Published: (2026)

What Should Baby Models Read? Exploring Sample-Efficient Data Composition on Model Performance
by: Yam, Hong Meng, et al.
Published: (2024)

Completing Missing Annotation: Multi-Agent Debate for Accurate and Scalable Relevant Assessment for IR Benchmarks
by: Ban, Minjeong, et al.
Published: (2026)

The Good, The Bad, and The Greedy: Evaluation of LLMs Should Not Ignore Non-Determinism
by: Song, Yifan, et al.
Published: (2024)

Multi-Agent LLMs for Generating Research Limitations
by: Azher, Ibrahim Al, et al.
Published: (2025)

Argument Collapse: LLMs Flatten Long-Form Public Debate
by: Kim, Yekyung, et al.
Published: (2026)

Debating with More Persuasive LLMs Leads to More Truthful Answers
by: Khan, Akbir, et al.
Published: (2024)

Because we have LLMs, we Can and Should Pursue Agentic Interpretability
by: Kim, Been, et al.
Published: (2025)

Multiple LLM Agents Debate for Equitable Cultural Alignment
by: Ki, Dayeon, et al.
Published: (2025)

Look Within, Why LLMs Hallucinate: A Causal Perspective
by: Li, He, et al.
Published: (2024)

A Survey of Text-to-SQL in the Era of LLMs: Where are we, and where are we going?
by: Liu, Xinyu, et al.
Published: (2024)

Dispelling the Mirage of Progress in Offline MARL through Standardised Baselines and Evaluation
by: Formanek, Claude, et al.
Published: (2024)