Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhao, Lei, Wang, Mengdi, Bai, Yu
Format: Preprint
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.00054
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916120773001216
author Zhao, Lei
Wang, Mengdi
Bai, Yu
author_facet Zhao, Lei
Wang, Mengdi
Bai, Yu
contents Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) -- the problem of learning reward functions from demonstrations of an \emph{expert policy} -- plays a critical role in developing intelligent systems. While widely used in applications, theoretical understandings of IRL present unique challenges and remain less developed compared with standard RL. For example, it remains open how to do IRL efficiently in standard \emph{offline} settings with pre-collected data, where states are obtained from a \emph{behavior policy} (which could be the expert policy itself), and actions are sampled from the expert policy. This paper provides the first line of results for efficient IRL in vanilla offline and online settings using polynomial samples and runtime. Our algorithms and analyses seamlessly adapt the pessimism principle commonly used in offline RL, and achieve IRL guarantees in stronger metrics than considered in existing work. We provide lower bounds showing that our sample complexities are nearly optimal. As an application, we also show that the learned rewards can \emph{transfer} to another target MDP with suitable guarantees when the target MDP satisfies certain similarity assumptions with the original (source) MDP.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2312_00054
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Is Inverse Reinforcement Learning Harder than Standard Reinforcement Learning? A Theoretical Perspective
Zhao, Lei
Wang, Mengdi
Bai, Yu
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) -- the problem of learning reward functions from demonstrations of an \emph{expert policy} -- plays a critical role in developing intelligent systems. While widely used in applications, theoretical understandings of IRL present unique challenges and remain less developed compared with standard RL. For example, it remains open how to do IRL efficiently in standard \emph{offline} settings with pre-collected data, where states are obtained from a \emph{behavior policy} (which could be the expert policy itself), and actions are sampled from the expert policy. This paper provides the first line of results for efficient IRL in vanilla offline and online settings using polynomial samples and runtime. Our algorithms and analyses seamlessly adapt the pessimism principle commonly used in offline RL, and achieve IRL guarantees in stronger metrics than considered in existing work. We provide lower bounds showing that our sample complexities are nearly optimal. As an application, we also show that the learned rewards can \emph{transfer} to another target MDP with suitable guarantees when the target MDP satisfies certain similarity assumptions with the original (source) MDP.
title Is Inverse Reinforcement Learning Harder than Standard Reinforcement Learning? A Theoretical Perspective
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.00054