Methods for Quantifying Dataset Similarity: a Review, Taxonomy and Comparison
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2023
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866918060713050112 |
|---|---|
| author | Stolte, Marieke Kappenberg, Franziska Rahnenführer, Jörg Bommert, Andrea |
| author_facet | Stolte, Marieke Kappenberg, Franziska Rahnenführer, Jörg Bommert, Andrea |
| contents | Quantifying the similarity between datasets has widespread applications in statistics and machine learning. The performance of a predictive model on novel datasets, referred to as generalizability, depends on how similar the training and evaluation datasets are. Exploiting or transferring insights between similar datasets is a key aspect of meta-learning and transfer-learning. In simulation studies, the similarity between distributions of simulated datasets and real datasets, for which the performance of methods is assessed, is crucial. In two- or $k$-sample testing, it is checked, whether the underlying distributions of two or more datasets coincide.
Extremely many approaches for quantifying dataset similarity have been proposed in the literature. We examine more than 100 methods and provide a taxonomy, classifying them into ten classes. In an extensive review of these methods the main underlying ideas, formal definitions, and important properties are introduced.
We compare the 118 methods in terms of their applicability, interpretability, and theoretical properties, in order to provide recommendations for selecting an appropriate dataset similarity measure based on the specific goal of the dataset comparison and on the properties of the datasets at hand. An online tool facilitates the choice of the appropriate dataset similarity measure. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2312_04078 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Methods for Quantifying Dataset Similarity: a Review, Taxonomy and Comparison Stolte, Marieke Kappenberg, Franziska Rahnenführer, Jörg Bommert, Andrea Methodology 62E99, 62G10, 62H15, 62H30, 05C90 Quantifying the similarity between datasets has widespread applications in statistics and machine learning. The performance of a predictive model on novel datasets, referred to as generalizability, depends on how similar the training and evaluation datasets are. Exploiting or transferring insights between similar datasets is a key aspect of meta-learning and transfer-learning. In simulation studies, the similarity between distributions of simulated datasets and real datasets, for which the performance of methods is assessed, is crucial. In two- or $k$-sample testing, it is checked, whether the underlying distributions of two or more datasets coincide. Extremely many approaches for quantifying dataset similarity have been proposed in the literature. We examine more than 100 methods and provide a taxonomy, classifying them into ten classes. In an extensive review of these methods the main underlying ideas, formal definitions, and important properties are introduced. We compare the 118 methods in terms of their applicability, interpretability, and theoretical properties, in order to provide recommendations for selecting an appropriate dataset similarity measure based on the specific goal of the dataset comparison and on the properties of the datasets at hand. An online tool facilitates the choice of the appropriate dataset similarity measure. |
| title | Methods for Quantifying Dataset Similarity: a Review, Taxonomy and Comparison |
| topic | Methodology 62E99, 62G10, 62H15, 62H30, 05C90 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.04078 |