Large Language Models are Clinical Reasoners: Reasoning-Aware Diagnosis Framework with Prompt-Generated Rationales

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kwon, Taeyoon, Ong, Kai Tzu-iunn, Kang, Dongjin, Moon, Seungjun, Lee, Jeong Ryong, Hwang, Dosik, Sim, Yongsik, Sohn, Beomseok, Lee, Dongha, Yeo, Jinyoung
Format: Preprint
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916241066688512
author Kwon, Taeyoon
Ong, Kai Tzu-iunn
Kang, Dongjin
Moon, Seungjun
Lee, Jeong Ryong
Hwang, Dosik
Sim, Yongsik
Sohn, Beomseok
Lee, Dongha
Yeo, Jinyoung
author_facet Kwon, Taeyoon
Ong, Kai Tzu-iunn
Kang, Dongjin
Moon, Seungjun
Lee, Jeong Ryong
Hwang, Dosik
Sim, Yongsik
Sohn, Beomseok
Lee, Dongha
Yeo, Jinyoung
contents Machine reasoning has made great progress in recent years owing to large language models (LLMs). In the clinical domain, however, most NLP-driven projects mainly focus on clinical classification or reading comprehension, and under-explore clinical reasoning for disease diagnosis due to the expensive rationale annotation with clinicians. In this work, we present a "reasoning-aware" diagnosis framework that rationalizes the diagnostic process via prompt-based learning in a time- and labor-efficient manner, and learns to reason over the prompt-generated rationales. Specifically, we address the clinical reasoning for disease diagnosis, where the LLM generates diagnostic rationales providing its insight on presented patient data and the reasoning path towards the diagnosis, namely Clinical Chain-of-Thought (Clinical CoT). We empirically demonstrate LLMs/LMs' ability of clinical reasoning via extensive experiments and analyses on both rationale generation and disease diagnosis in various settings. We further propose a novel set of criteria for evaluating machine-generated rationales' potential for real-world clinical settings, facilitating and benefiting future research in this area.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2312_07399
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Large Language Models are Clinical Reasoners: Reasoning-Aware Diagnosis Framework with Prompt-Generated Rationales
Kwon, Taeyoon
Ong, Kai Tzu-iunn
Kang, Dongjin
Moon, Seungjun
Lee, Jeong Ryong
Hwang, Dosik
Sim, Yongsik
Sohn, Beomseok
Lee, Dongha
Yeo, Jinyoung
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Machine reasoning has made great progress in recent years owing to large language models (LLMs). In the clinical domain, however, most NLP-driven projects mainly focus on clinical classification or reading comprehension, and under-explore clinical reasoning for disease diagnosis due to the expensive rationale annotation with clinicians. In this work, we present a "reasoning-aware" diagnosis framework that rationalizes the diagnostic process via prompt-based learning in a time- and labor-efficient manner, and learns to reason over the prompt-generated rationales. Specifically, we address the clinical reasoning for disease diagnosis, where the LLM generates diagnostic rationales providing its insight on presented patient data and the reasoning path towards the diagnosis, namely Clinical Chain-of-Thought (Clinical CoT). We empirically demonstrate LLMs/LMs' ability of clinical reasoning via extensive experiments and analyses on both rationale generation and disease diagnosis in various settings. We further propose a novel set of criteria for evaluating machine-generated rationales' potential for real-world clinical settings, facilitating and benefiting future research in this area.
title Large Language Models are Clinical Reasoners: Reasoning-Aware Diagnosis Framework with Prompt-Generated Rationales
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.07399