Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.07401 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914964947599360 |
|---|---|
| author | Zeng, Dun Dai, Yong Cheng, Pengyu Wang, Longyue Hu, Tianhao Chen, Wanshun Du, Nan Xu, Zenglin |
| author_facet | Zeng, Dun Dai, Yong Cheng, Pengyu Wang, Longyue Hu, Tianhao Chen, Wanshun Du, Nan Xu, Zenglin |
| contents | Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences has been recognized as the key to improving LLMs' interaction quality. However, in this pluralistic world, human preferences can be diversified due to annotators' different tastes, which hinders the effectiveness of LLM alignment methods. This paper presents the first quantitative analysis of the experimental scaling law for reward models with varying sizes, from 1.3 billion to 7 billion parameters, trained with human feedback exhibiting diverse preferences. Our analysis reveals that the impact of diversified human preferences depends on both model size and data size. Larger models with sufficient capacity mitigate the negative effects of diverse preferences, while smaller models struggle to accommodate them. To mitigate the impact of diverse preferences, we introduce a new metric, Expected Calibration Error (ECE), to evaluate RMs and show their obvious positive correlation with the alignment performance of LLMs. Furthermore, we propose a Multi-Objective Reward learning method (MORE) to enhance the calibration performance of RMs on shared preferences. Through experiments on four models and five human preference datasets, we find the calibration error can be adopted as a key metric for evaluating RMs and MORE can obtain superior alignment performance. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2312_07401 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | On Diversified Preferences of Large Language Model Alignment Zeng, Dun Dai, Yong Cheng, Pengyu Wang, Longyue Hu, Tianhao Chen, Wanshun Du, Nan Xu, Zenglin Artificial Intelligence Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences has been recognized as the key to improving LLMs' interaction quality. However, in this pluralistic world, human preferences can be diversified due to annotators' different tastes, which hinders the effectiveness of LLM alignment methods. This paper presents the first quantitative analysis of the experimental scaling law for reward models with varying sizes, from 1.3 billion to 7 billion parameters, trained with human feedback exhibiting diverse preferences. Our analysis reveals that the impact of diversified human preferences depends on both model size and data size. Larger models with sufficient capacity mitigate the negative effects of diverse preferences, while smaller models struggle to accommodate them. To mitigate the impact of diverse preferences, we introduce a new metric, Expected Calibration Error (ECE), to evaluate RMs and show their obvious positive correlation with the alignment performance of LLMs. Furthermore, we propose a Multi-Objective Reward learning method (MORE) to enhance the calibration performance of RMs on shared preferences. Through experiments on four models and five human preference datasets, we find the calibration error can be adopted as a key metric for evaluating RMs and MORE can obtain superior alignment performance. |
| title | On Diversified Preferences of Large Language Model Alignment |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.07401 |