Brodsky et al's defence does not work
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866912098754232320 |
|---|---|
| author | Stevenson, P. M. |
| author_facet | Stevenson, P. M. |
| contents | In their defence of "maximum conformality" methods, Brodsky et al make the astonishing claim that any RG transformation a'=a(1+V_1 a + ...) in QCD must have V_1 proportional to b=(33-2n_f)/6. It is well known that this is not true. I emphasize again the correctness and central importance of the Celmaster-Gonsalves relation for the prescription dependence of the Lambda parameter. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2312_11049 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Brodsky et al's defence does not work Stevenson, P. M. High Energy Physics - Phenomenology High Energy Physics - Experiment High Energy Physics - Theory In their defence of "maximum conformality" methods, Brodsky et al make the astonishing claim that any RG transformation a'=a(1+V_1 a + ...) in QCD must have V_1 proportional to b=(33-2n_f)/6. It is well known that this is not true. I emphasize again the correctness and central importance of the Celmaster-Gonsalves relation for the prescription dependence of the Lambda parameter. |
| title | Brodsky et al's defence does not work |
| topic | High Energy Physics - Phenomenology High Energy Physics - Experiment High Energy Physics - Theory |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11049 |