Galaxy-galaxy lensing data: $f(T)$ gravity challenges General Relativity

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wang, Qingqing, Ren, Xin, Wang, Bo, Cai, Yi-Fu, Luo, Wentao, Saridakis, Emmanuel N.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916345389514752
author Wang, Qingqing
Ren, Xin
Wang, Bo
Cai, Yi-Fu
Luo, Wentao
Saridakis, Emmanuel N.
author_facet Wang, Qingqing
Ren, Xin
Wang, Bo
Cai, Yi-Fu
Luo, Wentao
Saridakis, Emmanuel N.
contents We use galaxy-galaxy lensing data to test General Relativity and $f(T)$ gravity at galaxies scales. We consider an exact spherically symmetric solution of $f(T)$ theory which is obtained from an approximate quadratic correction, and thus it is expected to hold for every realistic deviation from General Relativity. Quantifying the deviation by a single parameter $Q$, and following the post-Newtonian approximation, we obtain the corresponding deviation in the gravitational potential, shear component, and effective excess surface density profile. We used five stellar mass samples and divided them into blue and red to test the model dependence on galaxy color, and we modeled the excess surface density (ESD) profiles using the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profiles. Based on the group catalog from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 (SDSS DR7) we finally extract $Q=-2.138^{+0.952}_{-0.516}\times 10^{-5}\,$Mpc$^{-2}$ at $1σ$ confidence. This result indicates that $f(T)$ corrections on top of General Relativity are favored. Finally, we apply information criteria, such as the AIC and BIC ones, and although the dependence of $f(T)$ gravity on the off-center effect implies that its optimality needs to be carefully studied, our analysis shows that $f(T)$ gravity is more efficient in fitting the data comparing to General Relativity and $Λ$CDM paradigm, and thus it offers a challenge to the latter.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2312_17053
institution arXiv
publishDate 2023
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Galaxy-galaxy lensing data: $f(T)$ gravity challenges General Relativity
Wang, Qingqing
Ren, Xin
Wang, Bo
Cai, Yi-Fu
Luo, Wentao
Saridakis, Emmanuel N.
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Astrophysics of Galaxies
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
High Energy Physics - Theory
We use galaxy-galaxy lensing data to test General Relativity and $f(T)$ gravity at galaxies scales. We consider an exact spherically symmetric solution of $f(T)$ theory which is obtained from an approximate quadratic correction, and thus it is expected to hold for every realistic deviation from General Relativity. Quantifying the deviation by a single parameter $Q$, and following the post-Newtonian approximation, we obtain the corresponding deviation in the gravitational potential, shear component, and effective excess surface density profile. We used five stellar mass samples and divided them into blue and red to test the model dependence on galaxy color, and we modeled the excess surface density (ESD) profiles using the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profiles. Based on the group catalog from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 (SDSS DR7) we finally extract $Q=-2.138^{+0.952}_{-0.516}\times 10^{-5}\,$Mpc$^{-2}$ at $1σ$ confidence. This result indicates that $f(T)$ corrections on top of General Relativity are favored. Finally, we apply information criteria, such as the AIC and BIC ones, and although the dependence of $f(T)$ gravity on the off-center effect implies that its optimality needs to be carefully studied, our analysis shows that $f(T)$ gravity is more efficient in fitting the data comparing to General Relativity and $Λ$CDM paradigm, and thus it offers a challenge to the latter.
title Galaxy-galaxy lensing data: $f(T)$ gravity challenges General Relativity
topic Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Astrophysics of Galaxies
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
High Energy Physics - Theory
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.17053