Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Purchase, Helen C., Hamer, John |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00980 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
On The Peer Review Reports: Does Size Matter?
by: Maddi, Abdelghani, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Maddi, Abdelghani, et al.
Published: (2024)
Deferred Acceptance Algorithm Improves Peer Review Process
by: Bartneck, Christoph, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Bartneck, Christoph, et al.
Published: (2026)
Pre-review to Peer review: Pitfalls of Automating Reviews using Large Language Models
by: Akella, Akhil Pandey, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Akella, Akhil Pandey, et al.
Published: (2025)
R-Index: A Metric for Assessing Researcher Contributions to Peer Review
by: Malekzadeh, Milad
Published: (2024)
by: Malekzadeh, Milad
Published: (2024)
ML Researchers Support Openness in Peer Review But Are Concerned About Resubmission Bias
by: Rao, Vishisht, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Rao, Vishisht, et al.
Published: (2025)
Can Large Language Models Evaluate Grant Proposal Quality? Revisiting the Wennerås and Wold Peer Review Data
by: Sandström, Ulf, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Sandström, Ulf, et al.
Published: (2026)
Peer Reviews of Peer Reviews: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Other Experiments
by: Goldberg, Alexander, et al.
Published: (2023)
by: Goldberg, Alexander, et al.
Published: (2023)
Hotspots and Trends in Magnetoencephalography Research (2013-2022): A Bibliometric Analysis
by: Liu, Shen, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Liu, Shen, et al.
Published: (2024)
Prevalence and Trends in Global Retractions Explored Through a Topic Lens
by: Zhou, Zhengyi, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Zhou, Zhengyi, et al.
Published: (2025)
ARA: Agentic Reproducibility Assessment For Scalable Support Of Scientific Peer-Review
by: Riehl, Kevin, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Riehl, Kevin, et al.
Published: (2026)
Gender and Discipline Shape Length, Content and Tone of Grant Peer Review Reports
by: Müller, Stefan, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Müller, Stefan, et al.
Published: (2025)
Detecting LLM-Generated Peer Reviews
by: Rao, Vishisht, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Rao, Vishisht, et al.
Published: (2025)
Artificial Intelligence Applications in Lean Startup Methodology: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends and Future Directions
by: Omidmand, Parisa, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Omidmand, Parisa, et al.
Published: (2025)
Trends in Open Access Academic Outputs of State Agricultural Universities in India: Patterns from OpenAlex
by: Roy, Abhijit, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Roy, Abhijit, et al.
Published: (2025)
Artificial Intelligence in Management Studies (2021-2025): A Bibliometric Mapping of Themes, Trends, and Global Contributions
by: Sekaki, Yassine, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Sekaki, Yassine, et al.
Published: (2025)
Global Research Trends in the Modern Language Journal from 1999 to 2018: A Data-Driven Analysis
by: Batcha, M Sadik, et al.
Published: (2021)
by: Batcha, M Sadik, et al.
Published: (2021)
A Randomized Controlled Trial on Anonymizing Reviewers to Each Other in Peer Review Discussions
by: Rastogi, Charvi, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Rastogi, Charvi, et al.
Published: (2024)
Toward Robust URL Extraction for Open Science: A Study of arXiv File Formats and Temporal Trends
by: Obadage, Rochana R., et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Obadage, Rochana R., et al.
Published: (2025)
Causal Effect of Group Diversity on Redundancy and Coverage in Peer-Reviewing
by: Goyal, Navita, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Goyal, Navita, et al.
Published: (2024)
Using LibCal Seats to Better Serve Students
by: Renaville, François, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Renaville, François, et al.
Published: (2026)
Evaluating the Predictive Capacity of ChatGPT for Academic Peer Review Outcomes Across Multiple Platforms
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)
Identity Theft in AI Conference Peer Review
by: Shah, Nihar B., et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Shah, Nihar B., et al.
Published: (2025)
University Students Motives and Challenges in Utilising Institutional Repository Resources
by: Masawe, Suzan, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Masawe, Suzan, et al.
Published: (2024)
Have we reached the beginning of the end for review papers?
by: Smyth, Barry, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Smyth, Barry, et al.
Published: (2025)
Commitment Checklist: Auditing Author Commitments in Peer Review
by: Chen, Chung-Chi, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Chen, Chung-Chi, et al.
Published: (2026)
Enhancing Peer Review in Astronomy: A Machine Learning and Optimization Approach to Reviewer Assignments for ALMA
by: Carpenter, John M., et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Carpenter, John M., et al.
Published: (2024)
Reforming research funding: Combining editorial preregistration with grant peer review
by: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Published: (2025)
Compound Deception in Elite Peer Review: A Failure Mode Taxonomy of 100 Fabricated Citations at NeurIPS 2025
by: Ansari, Samar
Published: (2026)
by: Ansari, Samar
Published: (2026)
Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis
by: Yu, Jianxiang, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Yu, Jianxiang, et al.
Published: (2024)
Library and Culture: A Scientometric Analysis and Visualization of Research Trends
by: Umar, Auwalu Abdullahi, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Umar, Auwalu Abdullahi, et al.
Published: (2025)
Publication Trends in Artificial Intelligence Conferences: The Rise of Super Prolific Authors
by: Azad, Ariful, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Azad, Ariful, et al.
Published: (2024)
Quantum Machine Learning: Unveiling Trends, Impacts through Bibliometric Analysis
by: Bansal, Riya, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Bansal, Riya, et al.
Published: (2025)
How do referees integrate evaluation criteria into their overall judgment? Evidence from grant peer review
by: Hug, Sven E.
Published: (2023)
by: Hug, Sven E.
Published: (2023)
Rejoinder: The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review
by: Su, Buxin, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Su, Buxin, et al.
Published: (2026)
Identifying Information Technology Research Trends through Text Mining of NSF Awards
by: Varlioglu, Said, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Varlioglu, Said, et al.
Published: (2025)
Unveiling Temporal Trends in 19th Century Literature: An Information Retrieval Approach
by: Datta, Suchana, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Datta, Suchana, et al.
Published: (2025)
Recent Advances and Trends in Research Paper Recommender Systems: A Comprehensive Survey
by: Pinedo, Iratxe, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Pinedo, Iratxe, et al.
Published: (2025)
Are Digital Humanities really committed to open? An exploratory study on the availability of methodological workflows and open peer review practices
by: Peroni, Silvio
Published: (2026)
by: Peroni, Silvio
Published: (2026)
Implicit reporting standards in bibliometric research: what can reviewers' comments tell us about reporting completeness?
by: Stephen, Dimity, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Stephen, Dimity, et al.
Published: (2025)
Documentation Practices of Artificial Intelligence
by: Arnold, Stefan, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Arnold, Stefan, et al.
Published: (2024)
Similar Items
-
On The Peer Review Reports: Does Size Matter?
by: Maddi, Abdelghani, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Deferred Acceptance Algorithm Improves Peer Review Process
by: Bartneck, Christoph, et al.
Published: (2026) -
Pre-review to Peer review: Pitfalls of Automating Reviews using Large Language Models
by: Akella, Akhil Pandey, et al.
Published: (2025) -
R-Index: A Metric for Assessing Researcher Contributions to Peer Review
by: Malekzadeh, Milad
Published: (2024) -
ML Researchers Support Openness in Peer Review But Are Concerned About Resubmission Bias
by: Rao, Vishisht, et al.
Published: (2025)