Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhou, Karen, Meitus, Alexander A., Chase, Milo, Wang, Grace, Mykland, Anne, Howell, William, Tan, Chenhao
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01405
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912498515443712
author Zhou, Karen
Meitus, Alexander A.
Chase, Milo
Wang, Grace
Mykland, Anne
Howell, William
Tan, Chenhao
author_facet Zhou, Karen
Meitus, Alexander A.
Chase, Milo
Wang, Grace
Mykland, Anne
Howell, William
Tan, Chenhao
contents Do American presidents speak discernibly different from each other? If so, in what ways? And are these differences confined to any single medium of communication? To investigate these questions, this paper introduces a novel metric of uniqueness based on large language models, develops a new lexicon for divisive speech, and presents a framework for assessing the distinctive ways in which presidents speak about their political opponents. Applying these tools to a variety of corpora of presidential speeches, we find considerable evidence that Donald Trump's speech patterns diverge from those of all major party nominees for the presidency in recent history. Trump is significantly more distinctive than his fellow Republicans, whose uniqueness values appear closer to those of the Democrats. Contributing to these differences is Trump's employment of divisive and antagonistic language, particularly when targeting his political opponents. These differences hold across a variety of measurement strategies, arise on both the campaign trail and in official presidential addresses, and do not appear to be an artifact of secular changes in presidential communications.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2401_01405
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Quantifying the Uniqueness and Divisiveness of Presidential Discourse
Zhou, Karen
Meitus, Alexander A.
Chase, Milo
Wang, Grace
Mykland, Anne
Howell, William
Tan, Chenhao
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Computers and Society
Social and Information Networks
Do American presidents speak discernibly different from each other? If so, in what ways? And are these differences confined to any single medium of communication? To investigate these questions, this paper introduces a novel metric of uniqueness based on large language models, develops a new lexicon for divisive speech, and presents a framework for assessing the distinctive ways in which presidents speak about their political opponents. Applying these tools to a variety of corpora of presidential speeches, we find considerable evidence that Donald Trump's speech patterns diverge from those of all major party nominees for the presidency in recent history. Trump is significantly more distinctive than his fellow Republicans, whose uniqueness values appear closer to those of the Democrats. Contributing to these differences is Trump's employment of divisive and antagonistic language, particularly when targeting his political opponents. These differences hold across a variety of measurement strategies, arise on both the campaign trail and in official presidential addresses, and do not appear to be an artifact of secular changes in presidential communications.
title Quantifying the Uniqueness and Divisiveness of Presidential Discourse
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Computers and Society
Social and Information Networks
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01405