Airline recovery problem under disruptions: A review
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866929212141600768 |
|---|---|
| author | Wu, Shuai Liu, Enze Cao, Rui Bai, Qiang |
| author_facet | Wu, Shuai Liu, Enze Cao, Rui Bai, Qiang |
| contents | In practice, both passenger and cargo flights are vulnerable to unexpected factors, such as adverse weather, airport flow control, crew absence, unexpected aircraft maintenance, and pandemic, which can cause disruptions in flight schedules. Thus, managers need to reallocate relevant resources to ensure that the airport can return to normal operations on the basis of minimum cost, which is the airline recovery problem. Airline recovery is an active research area, with a lot of publications in recent years. To better summarize the progress of airline recovery, first of all, keywords are chosen to search the relevant studies, then software is used to analyze the existing studies in terms of the number of papers, keywords, and sources. Secondly, the airline recovery problem is divided into two categories, namely Passenger-Oriented Airline Recovery Problem (POARP) and Cargo-Oriented Airline Recovery Problem (COARP). In POARP, the existing studies are classified according to recovery strategies, including common recovery strategies, cruise speed control strategy, flexible aircraft maintenance strategy, multi-modal transportation strategy, passenger-centric recovery strategy, and clubbing of flights strategy. Moreover, the POARP is discussed from the perspectives of disruption types, recovery strategies, problem types, objective functions, and solution methods. Thirdly, POARP and COARP are compared from the perspectives of timeliness, subjectivity, flexibility, transferability, and combinability. Finally, the conclusions are drawn and future study directions are provided. For future studies, it is recommended to conduct more in-depth research on dynamic and real-time recovery, incorporating human factors into the modeling, multi-modal transportation coupling, optimization of other airport processes, combination of robust scheduling and airline recovery, and optimization algorithm improvement. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2401_04866 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Airline recovery problem under disruptions: A review Wu, Shuai Liu, Enze Cao, Rui Bai, Qiang Optimization and Control In practice, both passenger and cargo flights are vulnerable to unexpected factors, such as adverse weather, airport flow control, crew absence, unexpected aircraft maintenance, and pandemic, which can cause disruptions in flight schedules. Thus, managers need to reallocate relevant resources to ensure that the airport can return to normal operations on the basis of minimum cost, which is the airline recovery problem. Airline recovery is an active research area, with a lot of publications in recent years. To better summarize the progress of airline recovery, first of all, keywords are chosen to search the relevant studies, then software is used to analyze the existing studies in terms of the number of papers, keywords, and sources. Secondly, the airline recovery problem is divided into two categories, namely Passenger-Oriented Airline Recovery Problem (POARP) and Cargo-Oriented Airline Recovery Problem (COARP). In POARP, the existing studies are classified according to recovery strategies, including common recovery strategies, cruise speed control strategy, flexible aircraft maintenance strategy, multi-modal transportation strategy, passenger-centric recovery strategy, and clubbing of flights strategy. Moreover, the POARP is discussed from the perspectives of disruption types, recovery strategies, problem types, objective functions, and solution methods. Thirdly, POARP and COARP are compared from the perspectives of timeliness, subjectivity, flexibility, transferability, and combinability. Finally, the conclusions are drawn and future study directions are provided. For future studies, it is recommended to conduct more in-depth research on dynamic and real-time recovery, incorporating human factors into the modeling, multi-modal transportation coupling, optimization of other airport processes, combination of robust scheduling and airline recovery, and optimization algorithm improvement. |
| title | Airline recovery problem under disruptions: A review |
| topic | Optimization and Control |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.04866 |