On merit and equity in math

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Givental, Alexander
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910295424761856
author Givental, Alexander
author_facet Givental, Alexander
contents In recent paper "Quantifying Inequities and Documenting Elitism in PhD-granting Mathematical Sciences Departments in the United States" (arXiv:2308.13750) by a group of accomplished and/or aspiring mathematicians, the authors use data to challenge ``the idea that the mathematical sciences in the United States is a meritocracy''. We show that, regardless of the validity of the challenged idea, the arguments in the paper are invalid. Namely, among other flaws, they rely on a logical trick of asserting the validity of the conclusion derived from an assumption which the authors neglect to test (and which actually contradicts their own data).
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2401_06701
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle On merit and equity in math
Givental, Alexander
History and Overview
00A69 (Primary), 01A80, 97-11 (Secondary)
In recent paper "Quantifying Inequities and Documenting Elitism in PhD-granting Mathematical Sciences Departments in the United States" (arXiv:2308.13750) by a group of accomplished and/or aspiring mathematicians, the authors use data to challenge ``the idea that the mathematical sciences in the United States is a meritocracy''. We show that, regardless of the validity of the challenged idea, the arguments in the paper are invalid. Namely, among other flaws, they rely on a logical trick of asserting the validity of the conclusion derived from an assumption which the authors neglect to test (and which actually contradicts their own data).
title On merit and equity in math
topic History and Overview
00A69 (Primary), 01A80, 97-11 (Secondary)
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06701