Brain Tumor Radiogenomic Classification

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Mohamed, Amr, Rabea, Mahmoud, Sameh, Aya, Kamal, Ehab
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2024
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866916095287361536
author Mohamed, Amr
Rabea, Mahmoud
Sameh, Aya
Kamal, Ehab
author_facet Mohamed, Amr
Rabea, Mahmoud
Sameh, Aya
Kamal, Ehab
contents The RSNA-MICCAI brain tumor radiogenomic classification challenge aimed to predict MGMT biomarker status in glioblastoma through binary classification on Multi parameter mpMRI scans: T1w, T1wCE, T2w and FLAIR. The dataset is splitted into three main cohorts: training set, validation set which were used during training, and the testing were only used during final evaluation. Images were either in a DICOM format or in Png format. different architectures were used to investigate the problem including the 3D version of Vision Transformer (ViT3D), ResNet50, Xception and EfficientNet-B3. AUC was used as the main evaluation metric and the results showed an advantage for both the ViT3D and the Xception models achieving 0.6015 and 0.61745 respectively on the testing set. compared to other results, our results proved to be valid given the complexity of the task. further improvements can be made through exploring different strategies, different architectures and more diverse datasets.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2401_09471
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Brain Tumor Radiogenomic Classification
Mohamed, Amr
Rabea, Mahmoud
Sameh, Aya
Kamal, Ehab
Image and Video Processing
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Machine Learning
The RSNA-MICCAI brain tumor radiogenomic classification challenge aimed to predict MGMT biomarker status in glioblastoma through binary classification on Multi parameter mpMRI scans: T1w, T1wCE, T2w and FLAIR. The dataset is splitted into three main cohorts: training set, validation set which were used during training, and the testing were only used during final evaluation. Images were either in a DICOM format or in Png format. different architectures were used to investigate the problem including the 3D version of Vision Transformer (ViT3D), ResNet50, Xception and EfficientNet-B3. AUC was used as the main evaluation metric and the results showed an advantage for both the ViT3D and the Xception models achieving 0.6015 and 0.61745 respectively on the testing set. compared to other results, our results proved to be valid given the complexity of the task. further improvements can be made through exploring different strategies, different architectures and more diverse datasets.
title Brain Tumor Radiogenomic Classification
topic Image and Video Processing
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.09471