Machine learning classification of power converter control mode
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866913202114134016 |
|---|---|
| author | Ouali, Rabah Dieulot, Jean-Yves Yim, Pascal Guillaud, Xavier Colas, Frédéric Wu, Yang Wu, Heng |
| author_facet | Ouali, Rabah Dieulot, Jean-Yves Yim, Pascal Guillaud, Xavier Colas, Frédéric Wu, Yang Wu, Heng |
| contents | To ensure the proper functioning of the current and future electrical grid, it is necessary for Transmission System Operators (TSOs) to verify that energy providers comply with the grid code and specifications provided by TSOs. A lot of energy production are conntected to the grid through a power electronic inverter. Grid Forming (GFM) and Grid Following (GFL) are the two types of operating modes used to control power electronic converters. The choice of control mode by TSOs to avoid impacting the stability of the grid is crucial, as is the commitment to these choices by energy suppliers. This article proposes a comparison between commonplace machine learning algorithms for converter control mode classification: GFL or GFM. The classification is based on frequency-domain admittance obtained by external measurement methods. Most algorithms are able to classify accurately when the control structure belongs to the training data, but they fail to classify modified control structures with the exception of the random forest algorithm. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2401_10959 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Machine learning classification of power converter control mode Ouali, Rabah Dieulot, Jean-Yves Yim, Pascal Guillaud, Xavier Colas, Frédéric Wu, Yang Wu, Heng Systems and Control To ensure the proper functioning of the current and future electrical grid, it is necessary for Transmission System Operators (TSOs) to verify that energy providers comply with the grid code and specifications provided by TSOs. A lot of energy production are conntected to the grid through a power electronic inverter. Grid Forming (GFM) and Grid Following (GFL) are the two types of operating modes used to control power electronic converters. The choice of control mode by TSOs to avoid impacting the stability of the grid is crucial, as is the commitment to these choices by energy suppliers. This article proposes a comparison between commonplace machine learning algorithms for converter control mode classification: GFL or GFM. The classification is based on frequency-domain admittance obtained by external measurement methods. Most algorithms are able to classify accurately when the control structure belongs to the training data, but they fail to classify modified control structures with the exception of the random forest algorithm. |
| title | Machine learning classification of power converter control mode |
| topic | Systems and Control |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10959 |