Modeling Considerations for Developing Deep Space Autonomous Spacecraft and Simulators

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Agia, Christopher, Vila, Guillem Casadesus, Bandyopadhyay, Saptarshi, Bayard, David S., Cheung, Kar-Ming, Lee, Charles H., Wood, Eric, Aenishanslin, Ian, Ardito, Steven, Fesq, Lorraine, Pavone, Marco, Nesnas, Issa A. D.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866914646972170240
author Agia, Christopher
Vila, Guillem Casadesus
Bandyopadhyay, Saptarshi
Bayard, David S.
Cheung, Kar-Ming
Lee, Charles H.
Wood, Eric
Aenishanslin, Ian
Ardito, Steven
Fesq, Lorraine
Pavone, Marco
Nesnas, Issa A. D.
author_facet Agia, Christopher
Vila, Guillem Casadesus
Bandyopadhyay, Saptarshi
Bayard, David S.
Cheung, Kar-Ming
Lee, Charles H.
Wood, Eric
Aenishanslin, Ian
Ardito, Steven
Fesq, Lorraine
Pavone, Marco
Nesnas, Issa A. D.
contents To extend the limited scope of autonomy used in prior missions for operation in distant and complex environments, there is a need to further develop and mature autonomy that jointly reasons over multiple subsystems, which we term system-level autonomy. System-level autonomy establishes situational awareness that resolves conflicting information across subsystems, which may necessitate the refinement and interconnection of the underlying spacecraft and environment onboard models. However, with a limited understanding of the assumptions and tradeoffs of modeling to arbitrary extents, designing onboard models to support system-level capabilities presents a significant challenge. In this paper, we provide a detailed analysis of the increasing levels of model fidelity for several key spacecraft subsystems, with the goal of informing future spacecraft functional- and system-level autonomy algorithms and the physics-based simulators on which they are validated. We do not argue for the adoption of a particular fidelity class of models but, instead, highlight the potential tradeoffs and opportunities associated with the use of models for onboard autonomy and in physics-based simulators at various fidelity levels. We ground our analysis in the context of deep space exploration of small bodies, an emerging frontier for autonomous spacecraft operation in space, where the choice of models employed onboard the spacecraft may determine mission success. We conduct our experiments in the Multi-Spacecraft Concept and Autonomy Tool (MuSCAT), a software suite for developing spacecraft autonomy algorithms.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2401_11371
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Modeling Considerations for Developing Deep Space Autonomous Spacecraft and Simulators
Agia, Christopher
Vila, Guillem Casadesus
Bandyopadhyay, Saptarshi
Bayard, David S.
Cheung, Kar-Ming
Lee, Charles H.
Wood, Eric
Aenishanslin, Ian
Ardito, Steven
Fesq, Lorraine
Pavone, Marco
Nesnas, Issa A. D.
Robotics
Systems and Control
I.2.8; I.2.9; I.6.1; I.6.3; I.6.4; I.6.6; J.2
To extend the limited scope of autonomy used in prior missions for operation in distant and complex environments, there is a need to further develop and mature autonomy that jointly reasons over multiple subsystems, which we term system-level autonomy. System-level autonomy establishes situational awareness that resolves conflicting information across subsystems, which may necessitate the refinement and interconnection of the underlying spacecraft and environment onboard models. However, with a limited understanding of the assumptions and tradeoffs of modeling to arbitrary extents, designing onboard models to support system-level capabilities presents a significant challenge. In this paper, we provide a detailed analysis of the increasing levels of model fidelity for several key spacecraft subsystems, with the goal of informing future spacecraft functional- and system-level autonomy algorithms and the physics-based simulators on which they are validated. We do not argue for the adoption of a particular fidelity class of models but, instead, highlight the potential tradeoffs and opportunities associated with the use of models for onboard autonomy and in physics-based simulators at various fidelity levels. We ground our analysis in the context of deep space exploration of small bodies, an emerging frontier for autonomous spacecraft operation in space, where the choice of models employed onboard the spacecraft may determine mission success. We conduct our experiments in the Multi-Spacecraft Concept and Autonomy Tool (MuSCAT), a software suite for developing spacecraft autonomy algorithms.
title Modeling Considerations for Developing Deep Space Autonomous Spacecraft and Simulators
topic Robotics
Systems and Control
I.2.8; I.2.9; I.6.1; I.6.3; I.6.4; I.6.6; J.2
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.11371