Deep Learning-based Intraoperative MRI Reconstruction
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2024
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866916103427457024 |
|---|---|
| author | Ottesen, Jon André Storas, Tryggve Vatnehol, Svein Are Sirirud Løvland, Grethe Vik-Mo, Einar O. Schellhorn, Till Skogen, Karoline Larsson, Christopher Bjørnerud, Atle Groote-Eindbaas, Inge Rasmus Caan, Matthan W. A. |
| author_facet | Ottesen, Jon André Storas, Tryggve Vatnehol, Svein Are Sirirud Løvland, Grethe Vik-Mo, Einar O. Schellhorn, Till Skogen, Karoline Larsson, Christopher Bjørnerud, Atle Groote-Eindbaas, Inge Rasmus Caan, Matthan W. A. |
| contents | Purpose: To evaluate the quality of deep learning reconstruction for prospectively accelerated intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) during resective brain tumor surgery.
Materials and Methods: Accelerated iMRI was performed during brain surgery using dual surface coils positioned around the area of resection. A deep learning (DL) model was trained on the fastMRI neuro dataset to mimic the data from the iMRI protocol. Evaluation was performed on imaging material from 40 patients imaged between 01.11.2021 - 01.06.2023 that underwent iMRI during tumor resection surgery. A comparative analysis was conducted between the conventional compressed sense (CS) method and the trained DL reconstruction method. Blinded evaluation of multiple image quality metrics was performed by two working neuro-radiologists and a working neurosurgeon on a 1 to 5 Likert scale (1=non diagnostic, 2=poor, 3=acceptable, 4=good, 5=excellent), and the favored reconstruction variant.
Results: The DL reconstruction was strongly favored or favored over the CS reconstruction for 33/40, 39/40, and 8/40 of cases for reader 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Two of three readers consistently assigned higher ratings for the DL reconstructions, and the DL reconstructions had a higher score than their respective CS counterparts for 72%, 72%, and 14% of the cases for reader 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Still, the DL reconstructions exhibited shortcomings such as a striping artifact and reduced signal.
Conclusion: DL shows promise to allow for high-quality reconstructions of intraoperative MRI with equal to or improved perceived spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, diagnostic confidence, diagnostic conspicuity, and spatial resolution compared to compressed sense. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2401_12771 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Deep Learning-based Intraoperative MRI Reconstruction Ottesen, Jon André Storas, Tryggve Vatnehol, Svein Are Sirirud Løvland, Grethe Vik-Mo, Einar O. Schellhorn, Till Skogen, Karoline Larsson, Christopher Bjørnerud, Atle Groote-Eindbaas, Inge Rasmus Caan, Matthan W. A. Image and Video Processing Artificial Intelligence Medical Physics Purpose: To evaluate the quality of deep learning reconstruction for prospectively accelerated intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) during resective brain tumor surgery. Materials and Methods: Accelerated iMRI was performed during brain surgery using dual surface coils positioned around the area of resection. A deep learning (DL) model was trained on the fastMRI neuro dataset to mimic the data from the iMRI protocol. Evaluation was performed on imaging material from 40 patients imaged between 01.11.2021 - 01.06.2023 that underwent iMRI during tumor resection surgery. A comparative analysis was conducted between the conventional compressed sense (CS) method and the trained DL reconstruction method. Blinded evaluation of multiple image quality metrics was performed by two working neuro-radiologists and a working neurosurgeon on a 1 to 5 Likert scale (1=non diagnostic, 2=poor, 3=acceptable, 4=good, 5=excellent), and the favored reconstruction variant. Results: The DL reconstruction was strongly favored or favored over the CS reconstruction for 33/40, 39/40, and 8/40 of cases for reader 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Two of three readers consistently assigned higher ratings for the DL reconstructions, and the DL reconstructions had a higher score than their respective CS counterparts for 72%, 72%, and 14% of the cases for reader 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Still, the DL reconstructions exhibited shortcomings such as a striping artifact and reduced signal. Conclusion: DL shows promise to allow for high-quality reconstructions of intraoperative MRI with equal to or improved perceived spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, diagnostic confidence, diagnostic conspicuity, and spatial resolution compared to compressed sense. |
| title | Deep Learning-based Intraoperative MRI Reconstruction |
| topic | Image and Video Processing Artificial Intelligence Medical Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.12771 |