Evolving AI Risk Management: A Maturity Model based on the NIST AI Risk Management Framework
Fuente:
arXiv
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2024
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866910328337465344 |
|---|---|
| author | Dotan, Ravit Blili-Hamelin, Borhane Madhavan, Ravi Matthews, Jeanna Scarpino, Joshua |
| author_facet | Dotan, Ravit Blili-Hamelin, Borhane Madhavan, Ravi Matthews, Jeanna Scarpino, Joshua |
| contents | Researchers, government bodies, and organizations have been repeatedly calling for a shift in the responsible AI community from general principles to tangible and operationalizable practices in mitigating the potential sociotechnical harms of AI. Frameworks like the NIST AI RMF embody an emerging consensus on recommended practices in operationalizing sociotechnical harm mitigation. However, private sector organizations currently lag far behind this emerging consensus. Implementation is sporadic and selective at best. At worst, it is ineffective and can risk serving as a misleading veneer of trustworthy processes, providing an appearance of legitimacy to substantively harmful practices. In this paper, we provide a foundation for a framework for evaluating where organizations sit relative to the emerging consensus on sociotechnical harm mitigation best practices: a flexible maturity model based on the NIST AI RMF. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2401_15229 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Evolving AI Risk Management: A Maturity Model based on the NIST AI Risk Management Framework Dotan, Ravit Blili-Hamelin, Borhane Madhavan, Ravi Matthews, Jeanna Scarpino, Joshua Computers and Society Researchers, government bodies, and organizations have been repeatedly calling for a shift in the responsible AI community from general principles to tangible and operationalizable practices in mitigating the potential sociotechnical harms of AI. Frameworks like the NIST AI RMF embody an emerging consensus on recommended practices in operationalizing sociotechnical harm mitigation. However, private sector organizations currently lag far behind this emerging consensus. Implementation is sporadic and selective at best. At worst, it is ineffective and can risk serving as a misleading veneer of trustworthy processes, providing an appearance of legitimacy to substantively harmful practices. In this paper, we provide a foundation for a framework for evaluating where organizations sit relative to the emerging consensus on sociotechnical harm mitigation best practices: a flexible maturity model based on the NIST AI RMF. |
| title | Evolving AI Risk Management: A Maturity Model based on the NIST AI Risk Management Framework |
| topic | Computers and Society |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.15229 |