Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16212 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866929227090100224 |
|---|---|
| author | Martin, Lauren Whitehouse, Nick Yiu, Stephanie Catterson, Lizzie Perera, Rivindu |
| author_facet | Martin, Lauren Whitehouse, Nick Yiu, Stephanie Catterson, Lizzie Perera, Rivindu |
| contents | This paper presents a groundbreaking comparison between Large Language Models and traditional legal contract reviewers, Junior Lawyers and Legal Process Outsourcers. We dissect whether LLMs can outperform humans in accuracy, speed, and cost efficiency during contract review. Our empirical analysis benchmarks LLMs against a ground truth set by Senior Lawyers, uncovering that advanced models match or exceed human accuracy in determining legal issues. In speed, LLMs complete reviews in mere seconds, eclipsing the hours required by their human counterparts. Cost wise, LLMs operate at a fraction of the price, offering a staggering 99.97 percent reduction in cost over traditional methods. These results are not just statistics, they signal a seismic shift in legal practice. LLMs stand poised to disrupt the legal industry, enhancing accessibility and efficiency of legal services. Our research asserts that the era of LLM dominance in legal contract review is upon us, challenging the status quo and calling for a reimagined future of legal workflows. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2401_16212 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Better Call GPT, Comparing Large Language Models Against Lawyers Martin, Lauren Whitehouse, Nick Yiu, Stephanie Catterson, Lizzie Perera, Rivindu Computers and Society Computation and Language This paper presents a groundbreaking comparison between Large Language Models and traditional legal contract reviewers, Junior Lawyers and Legal Process Outsourcers. We dissect whether LLMs can outperform humans in accuracy, speed, and cost efficiency during contract review. Our empirical analysis benchmarks LLMs against a ground truth set by Senior Lawyers, uncovering that advanced models match or exceed human accuracy in determining legal issues. In speed, LLMs complete reviews in mere seconds, eclipsing the hours required by their human counterparts. Cost wise, LLMs operate at a fraction of the price, offering a staggering 99.97 percent reduction in cost over traditional methods. These results are not just statistics, they signal a seismic shift in legal practice. LLMs stand poised to disrupt the legal industry, enhancing accessibility and efficiency of legal services. Our research asserts that the era of LLM dominance in legal contract review is upon us, challenging the status quo and calling for a reimagined future of legal workflows. |
| title | Better Call GPT, Comparing Large Language Models Against Lawyers |
| topic | Computers and Society Computation and Language |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16212 |