Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Shubatt, Cassidy, Yang, Jeffrey
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.17578
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866917370415546368
author Shubatt, Cassidy
Yang, Jeffrey
author_facet Shubatt, Cassidy
Yang, Jeffrey
contents Using theory and experiments, this paper shows that the difficulty of making tradeoffs offers a parsimonious explanation for a wide range of behavioral phenomena. We develop a model of imprecise comparisons applicable to multiattribute, lottery, and intertemporal choice, which formalizes the idea that comparisons are difficult when they involve pronounced tradeoffs. Our model rationalizes a range of documented regularities, such as context effects, preference reversals, apparent probability weighting and hyperbolic discounting, and generates novel implications for behavior. We assess the explanatory power of our model in a series of choice experiments. Our model explains a large share of the variation in choice inconsistency across problems, and we document that manipulating tradeoffs reverses classic behavioral regularities, in line with its predictions.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2401_17578
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Tradeoffs and Comparison Complexity
Shubatt, Cassidy
Yang, Jeffrey
General Economics
Economics
91-05 (Primary) 91B06 (Secondary)
Using theory and experiments, this paper shows that the difficulty of making tradeoffs offers a parsimonious explanation for a wide range of behavioral phenomena. We develop a model of imprecise comparisons applicable to multiattribute, lottery, and intertemporal choice, which formalizes the idea that comparisons are difficult when they involve pronounced tradeoffs. Our model rationalizes a range of documented regularities, such as context effects, preference reversals, apparent probability weighting and hyperbolic discounting, and generates novel implications for behavior. We assess the explanatory power of our model in a series of choice experiments. Our model explains a large share of the variation in choice inconsistency across problems, and we document that manipulating tradeoffs reverses classic behavioral regularities, in line with its predictions.
title Tradeoffs and Comparison Complexity
topic General Economics
Economics
91-05 (Primary) 91B06 (Secondary)
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.17578