Hierarchical Bias-Driven Stratification for Interpretable Causal Effect Estimation
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866916111187968000 |
|---|---|
| author | Ter-Minassian, Lucile Szlak, Liran Karavani, Ehud Holmes, Chris Shimoni, Yishai |
| author_facet | Ter-Minassian, Lucile Szlak, Liran Karavani, Ehud Holmes, Chris Shimoni, Yishai |
| contents | Interpretability and transparency are essential for incorporating causal effect models from observational data into policy decision-making. They can provide trust for the model in the absence of ground truth labels to evaluate the accuracy of such models. To date, attempts at transparent causal effect estimation consist of applying post hoc explanation methods to black-box models, which are not interpretable. Here, we present BICauseTree: an interpretable balancing method that identifies clusters where natural experiments occur locally. Our approach builds on decision trees with a customized objective function to improve balancing and reduce treatment allocation bias. Consequently, it can additionally detect subgroups presenting positivity violations, exclude them, and provide a covariate-based definition of the target population we can infer from and generalize to. We evaluate the method's performance using synthetic and realistic datasets, explore its bias-interpretability tradeoff, and show that it is comparable with existing approaches. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2401_17737 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Hierarchical Bias-Driven Stratification for Interpretable Causal Effect Estimation Ter-Minassian, Lucile Szlak, Liran Karavani, Ehud Holmes, Chris Shimoni, Yishai Methodology Machine Learning Interpretability and transparency are essential for incorporating causal effect models from observational data into policy decision-making. They can provide trust for the model in the absence of ground truth labels to evaluate the accuracy of such models. To date, attempts at transparent causal effect estimation consist of applying post hoc explanation methods to black-box models, which are not interpretable. Here, we present BICauseTree: an interpretable balancing method that identifies clusters where natural experiments occur locally. Our approach builds on decision trees with a customized objective function to improve balancing and reduce treatment allocation bias. Consequently, it can additionally detect subgroups presenting positivity violations, exclude them, and provide a covariate-based definition of the target population we can infer from and generalize to. We evaluate the method's performance using synthetic and realistic datasets, explore its bias-interpretability tradeoff, and show that it is comparable with existing approaches. |
| title | Hierarchical Bias-Driven Stratification for Interpretable Causal Effect Estimation |
| topic | Methodology Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.17737 |