Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kamariotis, Antonios, Chatzi, Eleni, Straub, Daniel, Dervilis, Nikolaos, Goebel, Kai, Hughes, Aidan J., Lombaert, Geert, Papadimitriou, Costas, Papakonstantinou, Konstantinos G., Pozzi, Matteo, Todd, Michael, Worden, Keith
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00021
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909395249528832
author Kamariotis, Antonios
Chatzi, Eleni
Straub, Daniel
Dervilis, Nikolaos
Goebel, Kai
Hughes, Aidan J.
Lombaert, Geert
Papadimitriou, Costas
Papakonstantinou, Konstantinos G.
Pozzi, Matteo
Todd, Michael
Worden, Keith
author_facet Kamariotis, Antonios
Chatzi, Eleni
Straub, Daniel
Dervilis, Nikolaos
Goebel, Kai
Hughes, Aidan J.
Lombaert, Geert
Papadimitriou, Costas
Papakonstantinou, Konstantinos G.
Pozzi, Matteo
Todd, Michael
Worden, Keith
contents To maximize its value, the design, development and implementation of Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) should focus on its role in facilitating decision support. In this position paper, we offer perspectives on the synergy between SHM and decision-making. We propose a classification of SHM use cases aligning with various dimensions that are closely linked to the respective decision contexts. The types of decisions that have to be supported by the SHM system within these settings are discussed along with the corresponding challenges. We provide an overview of different classes of models that are required for integrating SHM in the decision-making process to support management and operation and maintenance of structures and infrastructure systems. Fundamental decision-theoretic principles and state-of-the-art methods for optimizing maintenance and operational decision-making under uncertainty are briefly discussed. Finally, we offer a viewpoint on the appropriate course of action for quantifying, validating and maximizing the added value generated by SHM. This work aspires to synthesize the different perspectives of the SHM, Prognostic Health Management (PHM), and reliability communities, and deliver a roadmap towards monitoring-based decision support.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2402_00021
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Monitoring-Supported Value Generation for Managing Structures and Infrastructure Systems
Kamariotis, Antonios
Chatzi, Eleni
Straub, Daniel
Dervilis, Nikolaos
Goebel, Kai
Hughes, Aidan J.
Lombaert, Geert
Papadimitriou, Costas
Papakonstantinou, Konstantinos G.
Pozzi, Matteo
Todd, Michael
Worden, Keith
Computers and Society
To maximize its value, the design, development and implementation of Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) should focus on its role in facilitating decision support. In this position paper, we offer perspectives on the synergy between SHM and decision-making. We propose a classification of SHM use cases aligning with various dimensions that are closely linked to the respective decision contexts. The types of decisions that have to be supported by the SHM system within these settings are discussed along with the corresponding challenges. We provide an overview of different classes of models that are required for integrating SHM in the decision-making process to support management and operation and maintenance of structures and infrastructure systems. Fundamental decision-theoretic principles and state-of-the-art methods for optimizing maintenance and operational decision-making under uncertainty are briefly discussed. Finally, we offer a viewpoint on the appropriate course of action for quantifying, validating and maximizing the added value generated by SHM. This work aspires to synthesize the different perspectives of the SHM, Prognostic Health Management (PHM), and reliability communities, and deliver a roadmap towards monitoring-based decision support.
title Monitoring-Supported Value Generation for Managing Structures and Infrastructure Systems
topic Computers and Society
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00021