Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00203 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866913218738257920 |
|---|---|
| author | Kretz, Ian D. Parran, Clare C. Ramsdell, John D. Rowe, Paul D. |
| author_facet | Kretz, Ian D. Parran, Clare C. Ramsdell, John D. Rowe, Paul D. |
| contents | In distributed systems, trust decisions are made on the basis of integrity evidence generated via remote attestation. Examples of the kinds of evidence that might be collected are boot time image hash values; fingerprints of initialization files for userspace applications; and a comprehensive measurement of a running kernel. In layered attestations, evidence is typically composed of measurements of key subcomponents taken from different trust boundaries within a target system. Discrete measurement evidence is bundled together for appraisal by the components that collectively perform the attestation.
In this paper, we initiate the study of evidence chain of custody for remote attestation. Using the Copland attestation specification language, we formally define the conditions under which a runtime adversary active on the target system can tamper with measurement evidence. We present algorithms for identifying all such tampering opportunities for given evidence as well as tampering "strategies" by which an adversary can modify incriminating evidence without being detected. We then define a procedure for transforming a Copland-specified attestation into a maximally tamper-resistant version of itself. Our efforts are intended to help attestation protocol designers ensure their protocols reduce evidence tampering opportunities to the smallest, most trustworthy set of components possible. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2402_00203 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Evidence Tampering and Chain of Custody in Layered Attestations Kretz, Ian D. Parran, Clare C. Ramsdell, John D. Rowe, Paul D. Cryptography and Security In distributed systems, trust decisions are made on the basis of integrity evidence generated via remote attestation. Examples of the kinds of evidence that might be collected are boot time image hash values; fingerprints of initialization files for userspace applications; and a comprehensive measurement of a running kernel. In layered attestations, evidence is typically composed of measurements of key subcomponents taken from different trust boundaries within a target system. Discrete measurement evidence is bundled together for appraisal by the components that collectively perform the attestation. In this paper, we initiate the study of evidence chain of custody for remote attestation. Using the Copland attestation specification language, we formally define the conditions under which a runtime adversary active on the target system can tamper with measurement evidence. We present algorithms for identifying all such tampering opportunities for given evidence as well as tampering "strategies" by which an adversary can modify incriminating evidence without being detected. We then define a procedure for transforming a Copland-specified attestation into a maximally tamper-resistant version of itself. Our efforts are intended to help attestation protocol designers ensure their protocols reduce evidence tampering opportunities to the smallest, most trustworthy set of components possible. |
| title | Evidence Tampering and Chain of Custody in Layered Attestations |
| topic | Cryptography and Security |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00203 |